For years Donald Trump was the host of The Apprentice, a reality TV show in which contestants vied for a management job within his organisation and he would deliver the verdict: “You’re fired!”

It cemented the image of Trump as an assertive chief executive who had conquered New York, an image that still proves seductive to millions of voters who want him to run America like a business. But like much else about the 45th US president, it was all a lie.

On Tuesday a judge found that Trump’s business empire was built, at least in part, on rampant fraud. Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York state court in Manhattan said Trump and his adult sons wildly inflated the value of his properties to hoodwink banks, insurers and others.

The decision will make it easier for state attorney general Letitia James to establish damages at a civil trial due to start next week; she is seeking a penalty of about $250m. Engoron ordered the cancellation of certificates that let some of Trump’s businesses, including the Trump Organization, operate in New York – just possibly the beginning of the end of his empire.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “It’s the corporate death penalty,” said Diana Florence, a veteran financial crimes prosecutor for the Manhattan district attorney’s office, now in private practice.

    “This ruling essentially dissolves his company,” she said, though she predicted that years of appeals may pass before anything actually happens.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-new-york-judge-finds-business-2023-9

    Think I’ll take a veteran financial crimes prosecutor for the Manhattan DA’s word over yours, sorry.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, says it’s a death blow for the corporation, not him. Also doesn’t say that he doesn’t get to profit.

      None of what I’ve said has contradicted anything that she said, so it’s not the “either or” situation you’re imagining it to be.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Again, says it’s a death blow for the corporation, not him. Also doesn’t say that he doesn’t get to profit.

        None of what I’ve said has contradicted anything that she said, so it’s not the “either or” situation you’re imagining it to be.

        The fine itself is less than what he raised in 8 weeks to pretend to investigate imaginary election fraud.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why you seem to think his corporation going under doesn’t hurt him at all is beyond me. It’s like if Tim Cook became a politician and you claiming that Apple going under because of an antitrust case doesn’t hurt Tim Cook. Of course it would. He’s built his entire reputation on being a successful businessman.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m not saying it doesn’t hurt him at all, I’m saying it doesn’t hurt him anywhere near enough.

          If Tim Cook pivoted to getting many times more of his personal income from political scams than from Apple, then your comparison MIGHT make sense, except even then it would be very far from an apples to apples comparison, pun intended.

          He’s built his entire reputation on being a successful businessman.

          He’s built his image on PRETENDING to be successful businessman and then pivoting to leader of a Christofascist cult.

          He was never good at business (as evidenced by losing a billion dollars total in a decade where every other ultrarich person was profiting like crazy) and he no longer needs the real estate empire.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Sorry… you’re saying he will raise a the same amount in 8 weeks as he did right after the election when everyone was fired up? And not cover all of his expenses but still pay all of his debt?

                This is a little silly.

                • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  No. I’m saying that he’ll raise that and more right after playing the marty, which is getting his cult all riled up. Might take longer than 8 weeks but he’s definitely going to get there. Nothing silly about acknowledging that tragic yet inescapable fact of his cult appeal.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Why would he raise more than he raised after the election over this court case? How is he going to raise $1.2 billion on top of all of his expenses, which runs into the tens if not hundreds of millions?

                    Even if he didn’t want to spend it on election expenses, he has a bunch of criminal cases he needs to pay for before he can even think about touching his debt.

                    So basically, you’re claiming that this won’t hurt him at all because he’ll raise billions of dollars, more than he’s ever raised before, when there’s absolutely no sign of that happening.

                    Well, I guess the Trump business should be allowed to continue to operate in New York since this doesn’t matter. Not sure why they even had a civil case in the first place.