• silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    That’s literally every company.

    As a manager, you get frustrated because no matter how good an employee is,they won’t let you rate them as high as they should be, for…reasons.

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      151
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Psst!

      Its because they don’t want to raise their pay, and also want the employee to blame themselves for not getting the pay raise/promotion instead of their greedy employer.

      But don’t tell anyone. Its a secret!

      • WhyIDie@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        another reason I heard is it’s also another tool to give the company wiggle room to say they’re not in the best state they could be, that there’s still room for growth. under the current system, companies have to keep growing and keep appearing to have the potential for growth, or die

        • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless you’re telling your sick grandmother she looks great, deception as a standard practice makes you a deceiver. They’re clearly comfortable with that, though.

    • RedditReject@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was actually told during a review that they couldn’t rank me higher because then they’d have to give me more money. My boss said I deserved it, but they didn’t have the money to give it to me.

      I started looking for a new job that day.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Used to work for CenturyLink. The year they took away our Christmas bonus is the same year the company really took a nosedive.

          CEO got a 20 billion million dollar bonus, enough to cover our Christmas bonuses and still give him 15 million.

      • lobut@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        I had something similar! But my manager was a former dev that I worked for that didn’t know how to manage and tried to convince me that I didn’t deserve it.

        I got a 30% raise moving elsewhere.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My wife’s company does this overtly.

      Raises are based on performance scores, they were prohibited from giving top scores for any category, because “nobody’s perfect.”

      But when asked what could be done better there’s never any answer.

    • sadreality@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Slave must work hard but slave must not be rewarded for that labour… That’s holy profit and it belongs to shareholders after top execs get their cut obvi.

      This is why every day more people are finding out that providing good service is for idiots who have no self respect.

      lEaDeRShIP

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 year ago

        The priest caste of capitalism - the economists - do not understand why lowly humans will not sacrifice their lives to the Great Eternal and Unaging Corporations.

    • ohlaph@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s why I focus on work life balance over everything else. No point in giving away weekends and nights for an average review. Average is perfectly rine with me, but that’s also what I give now.

    • ZooGuru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes. I work at a power plant in a large department. The best “ratings” that dictates our bonus multiplier is limited to five people because there are certainly only five people whose performance exceeds expectations. /s

    • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      The reason why is more that you have to justify top performmers against their peers and against their role responsibilities. That takes work and many managers dont want to do it.