• zephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Who’s funding it? The EU is in crisis, the US never funds infrastructure properly, and Saudi Arabia/India are more interested in coupling with each other via BRICS+ than with anyone else.

    Can’t wait for the West to fund a Saudi-India trade terminal and then run out of money.

    • Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Perhaps the bet is on India clashing with China over various bs and wanting to have its own trade corridor?

      • zephyreks [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        How does that even help India? India is only in this project from a single shipping link - not exactly tightly coupled to this trade corridor.

        Plus, the logistics of loading/unloading mean that trade is going to flow through the Suez anyway.

        • davi [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          How does that even help India? India is only in this project from a single shipping link - not exactly tightly coupled to this trade corridor.

          Plus, the logistics of loading/unloading mean that trade is going to flow through the Suez anyway.

          it’s not done to help india; it’s done to force india closer into the american & european sphere of influence so that india will be less able to ignore the usa or western europe demands; like the russian sanctions; and it also guarantees that both russia and china will stay as weak as possible by cutting them out of future business plans.

          this whole thing is very cynically smart; i didn’t know any better i would a have guess a lawyer came up with it.