In 2022, U.S. production grew by 3.6% to a new all-time high of 94.7 billion cubic feet per day.

When burned, that’s 60,000 tons CO2/day.

  • Drusas@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s great and all, but fracking is terrible for the environment. Not exactly a win.

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Are we energy independent enough for Republicans yet? Or is Biden still knee-capping our national security by producing too little?

    • lntlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If republicans were in the white house, we could have grown by even more percentages!! So many percentages… and the best ones too. People around the world would talk about how many great percentages we would have if we didn’t have Biden.

    • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      All I know is that my gas bill is 50% higher than last year, my power bill is about 30% higher, I can’t afford any of this shit, and winter is right around the corner.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans don’t care about energy independence, they care about money from industry lobbyists and talking points. If they cared about energy independence they’d be all in on wind and solar and moving toward electrification rather than depending on a commodity influenced by a global market

      • p1mrx@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of it’s going to Europe as a replacement for Russian gas.

        The main problem is that everybody’s been switching from coal to gas instead of wind/solar/nuclear, as if drinking more water makes it ok to piss in the pool.

        • zephyreks@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Wasn’t natural gas mostly used because coal was literally causing cancer and dog shit air quality everywhere?

          Also, natural gas is a pretty efficient source of heating as far as things go… At least until heat pumps got reliable enough to replace it.

          • p1mrx@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Methane is certainly less bad than coal, but it still moves carbon from the ground to the air that we don’t know how to move back.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll be happy if the world remains liveable for humans until before I die. The next generation though, is screwed and I am so so sorry for that. And no, there is nothing I can do about it.

    • lntlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      don’t get any ideas either! if you use direct action, you’ll be provided a prison cell in Cuba.

  • HowMany
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Then why is it so goddam expensive?

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeh, more emissions under Biden. More large trucks and SUV’s. Hotter summers, longer droughts, more of America being literally on fire.

    • lntlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      this has been true for every consecutive president: Obama more than Bush, Trump more than Obama, Biden more than Trump. it has more to do with growth than whose in the oval office

      • blazera@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The president oversees the department of energy. They could do quite a lot about US emissions. We need to stop giving them a pass for not.

        • lntlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          legislation like this must be passed by congress. giving the president this authority is not democratic. could work in China though and they have plenty emissions

          • blazera@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            why does everyone think executive departments dont have any authority over anything. The Department of Energy has authority over US energy policy and production. Yes giving the president this authority is democratic, it’s a goddamn elected position!

            • lntlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              then what’s congress for?

                • lntlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  yes, this is where the laws come from the president enforces. the president is an enforcer. a president who acts without congress is authoritarian