• camelCaseGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    So I’ll add the video to my list of TODOs. But I must admit that this discussion seems to be very USA centric. Here in Spain at least, lots of politicians and media do talk about which classes are affected by each policy and why. The same used to happen when I lived in Argentina.

    Of course there are a lot of places where there is no middle ground. But there are a lot of places where there is. Do we abolish private property? I don’t think there’s a middle ground there. Do we privatize the education system completely? Lots of middle ground.

    It’s as naive (and dangerous I might add) to think that there is no middle ground anywhere as to think there is a middle ground everywhere. Because again, both postures are extremes, and extremes are never good nor right.

        • DankZedong @lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Remember, if nazism is just an opinion to you and destroying it seems extreme to you because ‘freedom of speech’, you’re probably not threatened by it

    • relay@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be an extreme position in most of the United States history to completely honor the treaties with the American Indian tribes and not ethnically clense the population, but in my humble optinion that extreme position would have been a better outcome.

      It was an extreme position for John Brown to do what he saw was right for the society he was in, but he was certainly right to liberate the slaves.

      Can there be positions where compromise is necessary? Sure when material limitations show up.

      Compromising with entities that can’t justify their existence like the bourgeoisie are decisions where one of the more “extreme” options is the right one.