• FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    Skip electricity. That doesn’t matter until you can make reliable turbines with copper and magnets. Go to steam power first. It can move things. Which will speed up delivery of copper and magnets. But also teach them to plant trees. Every tree removed to smelt and power a steam engine needs to have three more planted. You could start greening the Sahara before umit even starts collapsing. “he sure had this steam thing figured out. I guess we will forgive him for all these useless trees”.

    • EddoWagt@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      A great master plan to prevent climate change, although the industrial revolution will start 2000 years earlier, so I’m not sure it matters

    • ramblechat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read they knew about steam power for a long time but couldn’t make the engines / containers / doohickies strong enough to contain the pressure.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, electricity would be magic for medieval (and prior) people. Spells trouble for you.

      But no, Steam… the principle was known and seldom used by ancient greeces and egypts already, but they couldn’t really utilize it, because metallurgy wasn’t there yet.

      And Sahara was almost green 1000+ years ago, lots of oases.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Boil water in a closed system that uses steam to move a paddle on the inside that is on the same shaft as a wheel on the outside. That’s the basics. Everything else is just variations on the theme. The higher the pressure the faster it goes and more torque you get.

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I forgot to mention that once the steam moves the paddle the steam needs a place to cook down and go back into the boiler.

          • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nah, for a first step implementation in stationary applications, you can have a steam machine run an open circuit. Steam expands, performs work, exits through a valve. Just keep the water tank filled. Less efficient, but it would work. The return loop is an optimization for the next stage :)

          • MoodyRaincloud@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            For better efficiency the steam should be used twice, in a high pressure circuit first and on its way back to the boiler through a low pressure circuit.

    • jarfil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Go to steam power first. It can move things

      They had steam power over 2000 years ago, they used it in temples and as toys to amuse the rich.

      Slaves could move things, and were much cheaper.

        • jarfil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          They had no incentive to use it any better.

          Without a printing press, which would increase the levels of literacy, and allow sharing knowledge orders of magnitude faster, there was no indication that a kettle could ever outperform a hundred men or a few dozen horses.

          • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a loop - they didn’t use it right, so it sucked, which is why they didn’t try to make it better = they didn’t use it right.

            With the right knowledge, they might’ve just made proper use of it

            • jarfil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yeah. But, could a single person break that loop? It seems to me like it would still require centuries.

              • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’d say it depends on the person. I’m sure there are some that would majorly change the course of history and then some that would get killed within an hour

    • Illegal_Prime@dmv.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The problem with this is that you assume that wood is the best fuel source for steam. Very quickly you would realize that coal is far more energy dense than just about anything except nuclear fission. Planting trees is still a good idea though, but wood as fuel is utter shite on any large application.

      • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        When starting out you don’t need the most efficient. You need what’s available. And I’d rather not reinvent coal mining and whaling.