‘We Cannot Win’ Says Top Russian Commander Alexander Khodakovsky
www.kyivpost.com
The leader of the Russian battalion defeated at liberated Urozhaine calls for “freezing the front” after his unreinforced troops were devastated in a rout.

https://archive.li/Z0m5m

The Russian commander of the “Vostok” Battalion fighting in southern Ukraine said on Thursday that Ukraine will not be defeated and suggested that Russia freeze the war along current frontlines.

Alexander Khodakovsky made the candid concession yesterday on his Telegram channel after Russian forces, including his own troops, were devastatingly defeated by Ukrainian marines earlier this week at Urozhaine in the Zaporizhzhia-Donetsk regional border area.

“Can we bring down Ukraine militarily? Now and in the near future, no,” Khodakovsky, a former official of the so-called Donetsk People’s Republic, said yesterday.

“When I talk to myself about our destiny in this war, I mean that we will not crawl forward, like the [Ukrainians], turning everything into [destroyed] Bakhmuts in our path. And, I do not foresee the easy occupation of cities,” he said.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    112·
    1 year ago

    It is Russian-speaking like OP specified, though, as well as Ukraine’s 4th largest city.

    If they only cared about Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk they had them and could have done nothing new, but they tried to take the whole country and so now here we are.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
      163·
      1 year ago

      They never tried to take the whole country. That’s just fantasy and doesn’t make sense for a dozen reasons.

      About two thirds of Dnipro speaks Russian at home, but ethnic Russians are only 25-30% of the population (see “Demographics”). I would imagine this is why the city is predominantly not separatists.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        31·
        1 year ago

        I mean, it used to be more pro Russian, but then Russia changed a lot of minds by actually showing up in 2014.

        They never tried to take the whole country. That’s just fantasy and doesn’t make sense for a dozen reasons.

        Riiight.

          • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
            7·
            1 year ago

            I have here in my hand a list of 205 . . . a list of names that were made known to the Secretary of State as being members of the Communist Party and who nevertheless are still working and shaping policy in the State Department. .

            I wouldn’t trust those US Military Analysts!

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            11·
            1 year ago

            Why would Russia want to occupy hostile territory?

            I don’t know, ask the Chechens, or any number of similar ethnic minorities that are part of the last intact European empire. Also, hexbears stop linking me to the same weird compilation of illegible and irrelevant crap.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
              3·
              1 year ago

              That link is perfectly legible and incredibly relevant. You just want to pull the “if you don’t have sources I demand them and if you do they don’t matter” bullshit.

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                11·
                1 year ago

                I never demanded sources, because you’re right, it’s incredibly easy to produce a shitty source. They’re mostly useful for uncontroversial things where there’s a lot of subject matter experts with no real stake in the exact answers.

                If you actually wanted to convince me Russia wasn’t trying to conquer Ukraine, I guess you’d have to convince me I don’t remember the winter of '22 right. I saw the shit happen, and I can read behind the lines well enough to know that when someone launches a full-scale invasion of a smaller neighbor starting with their capital, they mean to put it under their control, one way or another.

                • 420blazeit69 [he/him]@hexbear.netEnglish
                  3·
                  1 year ago

                  I didn’t say you demanded sources; I said you’re doing the reddit debatelord bit of “if you don’t have sources I demand them and if you do they don’t matter.” I had already provided a source, so of course it didn’t matter.

                  I see you’re still refusing to read that source, which talks in detail about the various parts of the initial months of the war, including the northern attack towards Kiev.

                  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                    21·
                    1 year ago

                    I said you’re doing the reddit debatelord bit of “if you don’t have sources I demand them and if you do they don’t matter.” I had already provided a source, so of course it didn’t matter.

                    I’ll admit I’ve done that before, but… yeah, it’s useless and I found that out. Same story if I gave a source for my thing unprompted. You’d tell me it’s just CIA propaganda or something.

                    I see you’re still refusing to read that source, which talks in detail about the various parts of the initial months of the war, including the northern attack towards Kiev.

                    I literally can’t read it very well. Does it expand on hexbear or something? I guess I could download it and zoom in, but why? You know as well as I do that one magazine photo won’t change either of our minds. If Biden himself came out and said it I’d say Biden was wrong. There are no special authorities on Putin’s motives.

                    Now, if you want to avoid being a debatelord, we could just stop now. Debate is useless, I just didn’t want to agree by silence.

      • yata@sh.itjust.works
        21·
        1 year ago

        They definitely did try to take the whole country, but had to change goals when that failec spectacularly. Then Putin concocted a new narrative and desperately wanted everyone to forget about the original one. Based on the copy paste comments from the hexbear brigade, it seems like you guys did in fact uncritically swallow all of Putns koolaid and forget very recent history in favour of the new fictional reality.