• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    3565·
    10 months ago

    I laughed and my partner ask why. I told her it’s some really nerdy humor. She was fine not hearing the joke, but I loosely explained it anyway. She humored me anyway. She’s a good woman.

      • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
        2419·
        10 months ago

        I don’t understand this partner thing.

        Idk why, it just bothers me to hear someone say that instead of girl/boyfriend or Significant Other.

        It just sounds so damn clinical.

        That said, I also choose this person’s partner.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zoneEnglish
          381·
          10 months ago

          To me, partner seems so much less clinical than “significant other”.

          Partner is good because it says nothing about gender, which is good if your partner does not conform to a gender binary, but also just if you don’t want to reveal their gender either to prevent people being weirdos about it—like they often can online, especially if you say it’s your “girlfriend”—or to protect yourself if, for example, you’re in a same-sex relationship. But it also says nothing too specific about the status of your relationship. Are they your girlfriend? Fiancée? Wife? Something less conventional? If it’s not important to the story, why not leave that detail out?

          • spauldoEnglish
            125·
            10 months ago

            I had a partner when I opened a computer shop back in the day. Closest I’ve come to having sex with him was the time I saw his wife topless through the window.

            Significant Other is much more specific.

            • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
              102·
              10 months ago

              It’s also much weirder sounding. You know what sort of partner they mean from context (same as you know if someone means girlfriend girlfriend or a friend that is a girl)

            • Zagorath@aussie.zoneEnglish
              1·
              10 months ago

              Sure, but like I said, significant other feels a lot more clinical and cold than partner.

        • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
          27·
          10 months ago

          Some languages - specifically Norwegian that I know of, don’t have separate words for “boyfriend” and “girlfriend”. In Norwegian we have the word “kjæreste” which can be directly translated to “dearest”. To me it always feels a little weird to use “boyfriend” or “girlfriend”, i guess the same could be true for other non-native english speakers.

          • Anticorp
            8·
            10 months ago

            Dearest is nice. I’m going to share that with my kjæreste.

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.worldEnglish
            2·
            10 months ago

            Yep, sounds weird for me as well. We have separate words for boyfriend and girlfriend, but those have a kinda deeper meaning*, using “girl” and “friend” to describe someone who’s really close to me is extremely weird. Like, the days she could be called a “girl” are in the past and calling her the same term as I call for example my work friends is just weird. So in my language I do use the equivalent of “boyfriend” and “girlfriend”, but almost never in English.

            * The word comes from a word for close friend and nowadays basically isn’t used to mean “friend” anymore. I mean, it still does, but no one uses it that way. And even then it signifies some deeper connection between people compared to our more common word for “friend”.

        • Moc@lemmy.world
          22·
          10 months ago

          My fiancé asked me to start calling her partner because she was sick of being called girlfriend after 8 years

        • scubbo
          151·
          10 months ago

          Personally I (a straight person) use it in an attempt to normalize the term, so that people who want to conceal the gender of their partner have plausible deniability. If all straight people say “girlfriend/boyfriend”, then anyone saying “partner” is outed as “a non-straight person trying to conceal the fact”.

          EDIT: but also, it connotes a deeper level of trust, support, intimacy, etc. A “girlfriend” is some chick I fool around and have some fun with; a “partner” is someone with whom I’m building a life together.

          • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
            6·
            10 months ago

            I’m bi, but my appearance is pretty queer coded such that cis-het people tend to read me as “unclear gay or just tech-nerd punk”. I’ve found that when I use the word partner, it can throw people off because they’re clearly fishing for my partner’s gender in a “I can’t tell whether this person is straight or gay” way. Most of the people I’ve dated have been men, but I do like the chaos energy of the confusion

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            1·
            10 months ago

            I do the same, and started for the same reasons.

            To me it feels like a simple enough courtesy.

            Though I’ll admit now that I also really appreciate the additional privacy provided by the habit, now that I have it.

        • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
          13·
          10 months ago

          Because she’s a woman and not a girl? (don’t shoot me, im not english native. But Partnerin is the same)

          • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
            31·
            10 months ago

            In English we use girlfriend and boyfriend regardless of age.

            It’s a weird quirk, but it’s a quirky language.

        • can@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
          9·
          10 months ago

          Some old nuts don’t like to hear that I’ve been living with my girlfriend for years.

          • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
            1·
            10 months ago

            Yeah. That’s another reason I try to help normalize terms like “partner”.

            It’s so much shorter to say than “fuck off, this is who I choose to spend my life with, the details are no one else’s business.”

            Maybe we could get an acronym though. That could help. FOTIWICTSMLW,TDANOEB

        • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
          3·
          10 months ago

          I find it interesting to hear you say this, to me, partner feels like quite a warm term. I think probably because for me, I associate the word partner with a sort of “levelling up” of a relationship, where you’re not just two people dating, but two people in a partnership to help each other be the best they can be.

          I do agree that it feels clunky sometimes though. I was catching up with a friend recently who paused just before the word “partner” every time. I pointed it out and we laughed at the relatable awkwardness of not feeling like you have a correct word when “girlfriend” doesn’t fit. He said that partner didn’t feel right either, but it was the closest he could find.

          I don’t recall ever hearing significant other irl, though I do sometimes see it online as SO. To me, that feels more clunky than partner.

        • Gsus4@feddit.nl
          2·
          10 months ago

          It’s fine, we’re all “users” here with 0 or more “partners”. Partners are second degree users who occasionally are first degree users too.

        • MajorHavoc@lemmy.world
          1·
          10 months ago

          I use gender neutral terms for my partner when posting online because anyone who thinks they need to know my or their gender for our anonymous online interaction is probably someone who I would prefer not know that detail of my life.

          As a bonus, I provide some safety-in-normalcy for others who would actually get treated worse were there situation known.

    • writeblankspace@lemm.ee
      1·
      8 months ago

      if only all my friends were like that

      They definitely tolerate my nerdiness, but they just don’t get it, even after an explanation.

  • UnverifiedAPK
    127·
    10 months ago

    It’s like that guy that posted an example Bitcoin miner on GitHub, then a bunch of script kiddies forgot to change his wallet info for their own before deploying… He made a good chunk of change by doing nothing malicious.

  • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
    11311·
    10 months ago

    So, essentially, really poorly written malware? Given the number of assumptions it makes without any sort of robustness around system configuration it’s about as good as any first-pass bash script.

    It’d be a stretch to call it malware, it’s probably an outright fabrication to call it a virus.

      • Knusper@feddit.de
        341·
        10 months ago

        I wasn’t sure about it either. There’s security researchers out there who might genuinely want to get a virus to run in a VM.

        But yeah, the cmalw-lib-2.0 gives it away…

            • chocobo13z@pawb.social
              2·
              10 months ago

              Not too long ago, when Fracturiser was a concern on Minecraft, and I read up on it, I got a chuckle when I read that stage 2 was a systemd service, and therefore couldn’t have run on my machine even if it had gotten that far (of course, I still checked for signs of infection)

            • BloodSlut@lemmy.world
              1·
              10 months ago

              systemd haters will moan and groan about ‘bloat’ and ‘unnecessary end-user hacking libraries’ smh

        • Zagorath@aussie.zoneEnglish
          17·
          10 months ago

          I wasn’t sure about it either

          It ends with them donating money to the malware’s creator…

          • Knusper@feddit.de
            6·
            10 months ago

            Yes, that is odd, but not impossible either. I’ve seen influencers do dumb shit like that for the attention.

    • makingStuffForFun
      9·
      10 months ago

      I think it was a fun post about what we go through sometimes just to get X or Y working. It was quite clever.

    • Isthisreddit@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      I know your shitposting, but I used to run into shit like this all the time back when I used to try to run Loki software games on Linux back in the day. Within 6 months all the games I had were un-fucking-runnable.

      It’s still a thing now depending how crazy you want to get with your system (let’s pretend you don’t run Linux on an x86 system for example - good luck lol)

      • Nato Boram@lemm.ee
        5·
        10 months ago
        Usage: ./malware [OPTIONS]

Options:
  -h, --help            Display this help message and exit.
  -i, --infect          Infect target system with payload.
  -s, --spread          Spread malware to vulnerable hosts.
  -c, --configure       Configure malware settings interactively.
  -o, --output [FILE]   Save log output to a file.
  -q, --quiet           Quiet mode - suppress non-critical output.

Advanced Options:
  -a, --activate [CODE] Activate advanced features with code.
  -b, --backdoor [PORT] Open backdoor on specified port.
  -m, --mutate          Evade detection by mutating code.

Description:
  Malware toolkit for educational purposes only.
  Use responsibly on authorized systems.

Examples:
  ./malware -i                  Infect local system with default payload.
  ./malware -i -s               Infect and spread to other systems.
  ./malware -a ACTCODE -b 1337  Activate advanced features and open backdoor.
  ./malware -q -o output.log    Run quietly, save logs to 'output.log'.
  • vsis@feddit.clEnglish
    36·
    10 months ago

    Sorry, folks. Using cmalw-lib is now deprecated.

    Cool kids are using systemd-malwd

    • chinpokomon
      17·
      10 months ago

      Even if it were inspired, it is significantly different the way it’s written. I’ve hit these same challenges before, so I’m more inclined to think it is independent discovery.

  • Cwilliams@beehaw.org
    2·
    8 months ago

    Text version:

    Downloaded a virus for Linux lately and unpacked it. Tried to run it as root, didn’t work. Googled for 2 hours, found out that instead of /usr/local/bin the virus unpacked to /usr/bin for which the user malware doesn’t have any write permissions, therefore the virus couldn’t create a process file. Found patched .configure and .make files on some Chinese forum, recompiled and rerun it. The virus said it needs the library cmalw-lib-2.0.Turns out cmalw-lib-2.0 is shipped with CentOS but not with Ubuntu. Googled for hours again and found an instruction to build a.deb package from source. The virus finally started, wrote some logs, made a core dump and crashed. After 1 hour of going through the logs I discovered the virus assumed it was running on ext4 and called into its disk encryption API. Under btrfs this API is deprecated. The kernel noticed and made this partition read-only

    Opened the sources, grep’ed the Bitcoin wallet and sent $5 out of pity.