Foldable smartphones have reached their fifth major generation, as heralded by Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5 and Fold 5…

For me it’s definitely the durability concerns. I’ve valued my phone’s water and dust resistance since getting an ip67 phone years and years ago. My brother had a flip and a grain of sand in his pocket got under the display; when he closed the phone the display died. And they expect me to pay more for the privilege.

    • Glarrf@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I respect your opinion, but for me is it hardly a gimmick. I don’t need a tablet in my bag to view websites that aren’t compatible with mobile layouts, I have a tablet in my pocket whenever I want. Sure it’s not for everyone, just like iPhones vs Android, but the form factor of foldables absolutely solves the needs of some customers and I’m grateful there’s a line of products out there that fits my needs.

      It took me a week or so to get used to the form factor but since then I can’t imagine going back to a slab. Different strokes for different folks.

        • Glarrf@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I work with a lot of crappy websites and embedded systems. I can’t always carry a laptop, so a mobile device fits my use case very well. I also use my large screen to do split screen with two apps open at once, it makes taking notes and observations from videos and documentation a breeze.

  • harmonea@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The phrase “what’s stopping you” implies we’re all interested, but hesitant.

    This is a really, really bad assumption.

    • Lev_Astov@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      It also assumes there’s anything stopping us. I’m annoyed they didn’t have a “nothing” option on the poll. I’ve been loving my Flip 4 and hope they keep making options like it when I eventually wear it down.

    • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Why are you not interested? I personally like the idea of either having a normal size phone that gets larger or a normal size phone that gets smaller. Are you saying you sre not interested in foldable phones at all?

      • harmonea@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Disinterest is the default position until something sparks interest. Asking why I’m not interested is, with respect, a nonsense question that can only have one answer: because I haven’t seen anything about it that sparks my interest. “It folds” is not enough to make me feel any desire to own one; I don’t care that it folds. I don’t need it to fold. To me, this is like installing a microwave in my vacuum cleaner. Like, sure, now my vacuum cleaner objectively does more stuff and “is better,” but that’s not exactly a feature I’m looking for in a vacuum cleaner, and size-changing is not a feature I’m looking for in a phone.

        If you want one, you should get one. I’m glad the option exists so that people for whom “it folds” is enough to spark interest can be happy and have neat toys.

        • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          I respect your opinion although I cant see why you think foldable phones dont make the phone “better”.

          • jsnfwlr
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Foldables have the potential to make phones better for some people. But better is always subjective. And in my opinion the current faults with foldables means they aren’t ready for me to use yet.

            • electrogamerman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              So the response to “what’s stopping you from getting a foldable” is: the currents faults in foldable. See? Its not too hard.

          • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            The trade off of a phone being half as tall is it’s twice as thick.

            I’m a man and pockets for men usually aren’t super short so the phone being tall isn’t an issue. And I definitely don’t want the phone to be twice as thick. Women’s clothes with their awfully small pockets I could understand. But I’m a big MFer so pocket size isn’t a problem.

  • RisingGrace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    1 year ago

    Price. It’s just too high to consider for me right now when I can get phones with the same computing power for half the cost

  • Nerd02@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhh the price tag? I just bought a new phone after 6 years of honoured service from my old one, payed the new one a whopping 300€ and it already felt like a rip off. Ain’t no way I’m paying four digits for a phone.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I don’t see the point of it. It might be smaller in height when folded, but it’s twice as thick. That doesn’t make it any easier to pocket.

    It also seems unnecessarily over complicated. The folding screen technology also doesn’t seem mature (high crease failure). I would think at least one or two phone companies would design them so they just met at a bezel-less seam rather than trying to actually fold an oled/lcd screen.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same with me. I just don’t see the point. I can’t think of a situation where I need my screen to regularly get bigger or smaller. It might be helpful once in a while, but not enough to get a phone that does that.

  • The_Fundertaker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They’re prohibitively expensive, the aspect ratio is dumb, and the fold/crease is distracting as hell.

    It reminds me of back in the '00s when people were getting the sidekick or whatever that “T” shaped phone was that Tony Stark had in Ironman.

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Price, durability, use case…

    There’s nothing about them that makes them worth sacrificing the first two above.

  • Big P@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    The price, the line down the middle, the hinge. Generally just not requiring any more screen space

  • meta_synth@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    -Not durable (If you can damage the screen with your fingernail it’s not durable enough. Period.) -No headphone jack

    • No expandable storage
    • No removae battery
    • Lack of support for folding screens in apps
    • Extremely high prices
    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      For real, it’s that easy for foldables. Sub-$500 foldables with really durable screens seems another decade or so away however.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    My phone hasn’t died yet, so I can’t justify buying a new one.

    I’m also afraid if my phone is too good, I’ll stop using my computer as much where I’m more productive

    Edit: wow, looking at the poll results, this is definitely a minority opinion. Most people are about price/durability

    • cloaker@kbin.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I totally get you on that second point, though I feel different on it. I feel regardless of phone type I would use it the same amount but I would like to have a Z fold when they’re better to merge tablet and phone into one. I’m absolutely one for durability though.

  • Ogygus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Cost

    durability

    Size

    difficult to repair (if not impossible)

    lack of sdcard (on such a large body)

    No open source ROMS

    • itsmect@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t mind spending on good tools, but I won’t buy a highly locked down device at any cost. An open source OS is a must, any new device will have to compete with my current phone that also has an SD card, headphone jack and is easy enough to open so that I can change the battery myself. Folding phones are inferior in all those aspects.

      • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To double or more the storage for much cheaper than the internal storage upgrades cost… is that not enough? Even the folds don’t have more than 512gb and they cost over $1000. My sub $500 phone from years ago is running a 512gb SD card, which I can seamlessly slot into my next phone when I swap.

        • Guster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, but why do you need Storage in the first place? I have always had less than 100gb and it’s plenty for all apps etc. Everything else goes in the cloud

          • vizean@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just because it works for you means it should work for me? I want more storage than you need.

          • IronKrill@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, let me pay the same I did for the SD card for half as much storage that will expire in a year ($40 for 200GB in GDrive). It’ll be super handy when I am on 250MB of cell data or have no reception at all and want to listen to my music in the cloud.

          • Ogygus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why need storage at all?

            Have the thing connect to the Internet to do even basic tasks like answering the phone.

            A mainframe of sorts.

      • Ogygus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        To carry the backup data to another phone If it fails.

        To have my high quality music and movies with me, at all times.