• paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can count on one hand the number of cities we have with actually usable public transport. It’s pretty bad.

    • pingveno
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      When it comes to public transportation in the US and Canada, any accurate statistics break NYC off from every other area. It’s just an extreme outlier. That said, there are plenty of places where you can live without a car, but you’re going to be sacrificing.

    • Stephen304
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Off the top of my head I think the best we’ve got is New York, Boston, Chicago, and Philly for the big cities, and for small cities you can either pick something on the edges of one of the big cities which kinda ride the coattails of the big cities transit or other isolated small towns that never redeveloped for cars, though those seem few and far between.

      • azimir
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Portland is quickly starting to climb into that group. A couple more light rail extensions and some more growth on their various tram lines and things are going to be world class for PDX.

        Seattle is also starting to build out transit at a fair clip, but it’s 5-10 years from having it really start to be good. I was really pleased to see that they are doing more than one transit project at a time. So many cities seem to be able to do one construction project at a time and its really frustrating at how slow things change at that rate.