• Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    a future where economic necessity is bypassed through technology, and individuals contribute based on personal fulfillment rather than class-driven labor dynamics.

    Yeah, however not all higher Maslows can be replicated, so obviously a fair bit of (popular or bureaucratic) meritocracy is incorporated into the redistribution and/or accesses to finite resources.

    (But the main point is that if individuals have the option to pursue personal fulfilment that is a huge net plus for the society & everyone can get more out of their life & life within that society - imagine only having people in the food industry that fully enjoy the work or the huge selection of artists not pre-smothered by the daily grind for basic human needs.)

    As you said, much data is missing, but I assume if I wanted a nicer office or an apparent with a better view I could get to it via contributing something of merit to society (eg a successful career, notable art contributions, maybe some hero stuff, etc).

    How come the Picard real estates remained in the family though all those generations, I can’t fully explain. Tho there basically was a revolution (a world war, but same diff) that facilitated initial systematic changes (I assume a much decimated/irrelevant previously-elite class).

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      How come the Picard real estates remained in the family though all those generations, I can’t fully explain.

      Doyalist answer: the writers laid out shipboard EPS conduits more thoughtfully than the Federation economy.