I’m starting to really consider the whole “reality is a simulation” angle, and whoever is running the game has put in a cheat code. (not really really, but more than I ever have before)

It’s like a shitty unrealistic movie plot has unfolded over the past decade. And every time it looks like maybe things are heading back on track, BOOM, we get another event that just turns us right back on the track to crazytown.

I’m having a hard time coming up with anything I can cling to in the hopes that Project 2025 isn’t going to go exactly as planned down to the last detail.

How are we not going to become real-world Gilead (but with more racism)?

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    1 day ago

    Can I ask a real question here? We know from being here on Lemmy that some people have a real hard-on for Marxism/Stalinism/Leninism. Why do these people think their pov is morally or ethically superior?

    The whole DEI stuff seems a bit like a Trojan horse to sneak in Marxist propaganda. Forcing people to accept immigrants with different cultural pov in a democracy is dangerous because you can end up relinquishing your country to another country’s agenda.

    Should people be more humane and considerate? Yes, fucking definitely. Should there be more regulations against some damaging effects of capitalism? Certainly.

    Does that mean people want to give up the means of production? Absolutely not. Does that mean people want to live in a China-like situation where you cannot own the land your property is on? No.

    Countries should be free to control immigration. That’s what sovereignty is. But the truth is simply this, all countries need immigrants, the natural competition created via the current state of capitalism demands this.

    • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m not sure that you’re asking a real question because your question contains a moral judgement which you then use as a bludgeon to attach boogyman words to concepts you don’t seem to like.

      DEI is completely unrelated to Marxism, and immigration policy. I get the distinct feeling that you either didn’t know what any of those words mean, or you’re hoping that the people reading this won’t know what they mean

      • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 day ago

        Also “Does that mean the people want to give up the means of production?” assumes the people own the means of production which would be communism and/or anarchism. Not sure what they think the means of production is or if it’s just a buzzword they hoped to toss in there.

          • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            24 hours ago

            Ah, still this wouldn’t really apply because the workers/ people don’t own this mode of production because, so they can’t give it up.

            The people you are thinking of are the ~400 individuals who own the means of product, and you are correct that they won’t willingly give that up.

            • nifty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Dude you read what I wrote wrong, or you didn’t get the context, it’s okay to say that instead of whatever verbal gymnastics you’re saying now. Grow up lol

                • nifty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  It seems a little unnecessary to spin words to be correct, you can just say you read it wrong or don’t respond 🤷‍♀️

                  Besides that, it’s okay. I know my anti-Marxist pov will always attract downvotes. I want to challenge the premise that a Marxist world is socially just or morally or ethically superior. I don’t want to troll or cause grief.

                  • 0ops@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    14 hours ago

                    Marxist, anti-marxist, I’m here still trying to piece together what the hell you’re trying to say

                  • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    19 hours ago

                    Most of your downvotes aren’t coming from being antimarxist but from blatant misuse of terms to try to scare people.

                    To take a note from your pages: it’s ok to just admit that you don’t understand what private ownership is, or what communism is, and it seems pretty unnecessary to spew such verbal diarrhea in order to try to scare people into whatever it is you’re trying to scare them into

              • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                Just take the L, dude.
                You clearly don’t know what you’re talking about. It’s like reading some garbage from chatGPT.

      • nifty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The climate justice aspects of DEI are philosophically meant to normalize “anti-Imperialism”.

        https://lawliberty.org/the-philosophy-underlying-dei/

        Meanwhile there’s nothing anti- imperialist about something like Marxism or Stalinism, the only difference is you’re ruled either by a single tyrant or a committee of tyrants.

        Edit I’ll just say this though, the sad thing to me is that so much of LGBT rights is wrapped up in postmodern ideology, but LGBT rights speak to fundamental aspects of being a person. LGBT rights don’t need postmodern ideology to validate those rights.

        • PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It seems like you’ve disproven your own argument that DEI is a Trojan horse for Marxism, because in your words “there is nothing anti-imperialist about Marxism”

          And then you go of on another tangent to pass judgement on something unrelated which you seem to very much want to relate

    • danciestlobster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Maybe a helpful starting point, if this is a real question, is for you to define what it is you mean by Marxism and what you find unethical about it more specifically. I’m asking the ideology as a whole, not a specific instance or country that claims to have it. For example I don’t think all marxists would be in agreement about if China’s government is a good representation of marxism (even if they call themselves communists).

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      DEI. Diversity, equity, and inclusion. Efforts within a company to NOT bar Black, Otherwise not white, and minority people WHO HAVE A LEGAL RIGHT to work in the country of the business, from being hired or promoted.

      The active effort of a company to not refuse to hire, or refuse to promote black folks from working there. Nor Women, lgbtq folks, or other minorities of any protected class. Which, just to be very clear here, doesn’t include any person who doesn’t have a proven right to work in the country of said company.

      Is creating an opening for other countries to change the priorites of the business’s country.

      Do YOU understand what what your saying is such insane racist bullshit, that it doesn’t even make sense to anyone who owns a dictionary and knows how to use it?

      Anti-DEI rhetoric is a very clear racist line of talking points Christo-Fascists in the US are currently using to justify overt racism, overt authoritarianism, and creating fear and division in a populace, The populace of the USA, that’s been extremely diverse with a large immigrant work force for literally mine and your entire lives, to weaken social bonds in the hopes that Trump and Republicans, who currently are eliminating goverment anti-corruption mechanisms, can get away with killing minorities, revocking civil rights, and looting the county.

      Why are you like this? Why do you think Racism, the only thing your defending in you’re reply, is such a gosh darn good ideology, that you’ll gladly give up every right and economic stability you might have had in life, just for the satisfaction of watching Hispanics get ethnically cleansed?

    • Kimusan@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Looks like you do not know a single thing about what Marxism/Leninism/stalinism is. Nothing in the US comes even close to this. The most lefties in the US would still be considered a far-right extremist compared to Marxism. Right now the democracy is going down the drain in the US and they Trump is doing his best to make it a dictatorship like in Belarus and Russia.

    • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Does that mean people want to live in a China-like situation where you cannot own the land your property is on? No.

      I mean good luck with that basically anywhere.

      If you don’t pay your property taxes, your fucking neighbor can just take your home by paying them for you, and that’s if the State doesn’t take it and sell it first.