Hey! So I have always wanted to make the jump to linux and pc gaming and figured I would do them both together. I would not consider myself techy, just aout tech literate in that I am aware of how much I dont know.

I have linux mint, on a mid to late i5 w/16gb memory. I wanted initially to make a home server but I have jusy been poking around and ended up trying to play all the games I have in attic through emulators and the like.

So I got loads of emulators, I use Cartridge which is a Lutris fork. It just seemed cleaner and worked when I tried it out. In that I had been booting into PCSX2 and finally playing MK Deception again. After three evenings poking and gaming PCSX2 shuts down every time I try to boot a game.

I have uninstalled, reinstalled and changed from 1.7.xx to 2.2 to the nightly 2.3 (I think). I cannot get it to work.

I have so many questions but if I could get back to Konquest I would be so happy, and bother you all later.

  • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Hello all, I made the jump.

    And I saw the avatar for the community, and for this fleeting moment thought it was a post about successfully making some particularly hard jump in supertux2.

  • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Are you only wanting to emulate games with PCSX2 or multiple different emulators? If the latter, have you tried the automated install process of Emulation Station or EmuDeck? I haven’t dealt with PS2 games through it yet, but maybe the automated installers and configs will help?

  • poVoq@slrpnk.netM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmm, has been a while since I last tried PCSX2, but isn’t there a module for it in Retroarch these days? Usually that works better.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Seconded. I went down the dark path of trying to hook up each emulator and it was pain. RetroArch made it so much simpler. (OP it’s not just for Arch, I learned that too late)

    • SolarPunker@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are emulators that works better as standalone, and sadly - as I love RetroArch - this is true for PS2 emulation since LRPS2 or Play! are not as good as PCSX2.

  • boerbiet@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have no experience with PCSX2, but maybe something in its configuration causes your issues. Reinstalling or updating it will not make a difference. If you really want to start over, close the application, remove the directory ~/.config/PCSX2 and restart the application. You will have to run through the initial wizard again. If it still won’t work, some other issue is the culprit and you would likely need to share logs. Alternatively, if the application prints logging to stdout, you could run the application from a terminal (f.e. by launching pcsx2-qt) and see if anything is printed there when it shuts down.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Okay so uninstalling and then pressing the shortcut opened it meaning it wasnt gone. This confused me. So just deleting the directory is how you uninstall?

      I got it back working, I left it hang for ages beyond the forcr quit prompt ans it started.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        no, you uninstall with the package manager/app store, however, that directory is where your config files are kept, and those are not removed when you uninstall the app.

  • 474D@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Emulators work pretty well on Linux. I mainly use them on steam deck with the bazzite distro, perhaps you might consider that over Linux mint? Don’t get me wrong, mint is amazing for switching from windows but bazzite is full on gaming focused.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I run bazzite on a deck as well, and the main reason is because I can actually use it as a pc without as much hassle from SteamOS really wanting to be read only.

        If I want to set up say, a dev environment, from git sources, and all the required libraries to compile things, bazzite comes with distrobox so it’s not too hard set that up… whereas SteamOS will blow up all of that when it updates, even after you turn read only mode off.

        That and the AUR sucks, lol.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          I thought Bazzite was immutable as well? I know I’ve faught with SteamOS a few times to make something work only to get it wiped, so that makes sense, but I assumed the same would happen with Bazzite.

          How do you find it? Do you miss SteamOS for anything or does it feel the same in gaming mode?

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            A simplified explanation is:

            Bazzite itself is immutable, but then on top of that base layer, its a customized version of Fedora, via DistroBox, which itself mostly is mutable, and allows for you to set up other DistroBox instances pretty easily.

            Bazzite’s system updater utility updates both the underlying Bazzite core, and all of the DistroBox instances running on top of it.

            99.9 % of the time there is no reason to mess with the immutable core bazzite stuff, but the distrobox containers built on top of it? You can do whatever you want.

            Also if you do fuck up the Bazzite core, you can fairly easily roll it back and reset it without losing your existing files, without having to re-image the whole SteamDeck.

            As far as the non desktop mode, actual SteamDeck mode experience? Seems the same in terms of game performance, but it is easier to add things like DeckyLoader and EmuDeck and what not, as that base Fedora instance comes with a bunch of utilities that help you install and set them up.

            EDIT: I am almost certainly not 100% technically correct in some way here, but I think this is generally accurate.

      • 474D@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I run a lot of “alternatively sourced” games and it has better compatibility with that. Pretty similar otherwise.

        • foggenbooty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Could you expand on that? Not the alternative sourcing, but why the compatibility is better. Is it just something to do with Fedora vs Arch, or is there something else that makes Bazzite work better?

          I source almost everything officially, but one I was trying to do was Mass Effect 2. I played 1 on the Deck and loved it, so I wanted to buy 2 and 3 only to find that they don’t sell them anymore. You have to buy this huge trilogy remaster pack with remastered graphics and huge file sizes, which defeats the purpose of a battery powered 720p device.

          I couldn’t for the life of me get it unpacked and working, even if I copied the files from a Windows computer over. I assume that I’m just not good enough at Linux to figure it out but that it is possible. Would be helpful to know of a different distro would make that easier.

    • Arehandoro
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not sure recommending a flatpak installation is the best thing to someone kinda new.

      • jamesbunagna@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Yes and no.

        Has it got its own set of rules you’d have to learn and thus an accompanying learning curve bump? Sure. Which, in actuality is mostly just knowing that Flatseal is your go-to whenever a flatpak causes issues.

        Is it a surefire method after you’ve become accustomed with it? Absolutely. All kinds of jankiness can prevent any piece of software from working on your system. With Flatpak, especially on distros that enable it by default, you at least know that your system isn’t the culprit.

        Besides, Flatpak is enabled by default on Linux Mint. The PCSX2 flatpak is even verified. So no additional setting up or whatsoever is required.

        What makes you weary besides what’s already stated above?

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Welcome in from the cold. We have cocoa and blankets.

    While I don’t have experience in this area, I trust that someone will be able to give you some advice.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hey thanks, it is a lot of fun but I cant explain why tinkering with basic shit makes me happy when I could get windows to do this stuff easier. I hate those guys but I feel like I spent ages setting the channels on a car radio and my brain relessed the dopamine as if I educated myself to be a mechanic

  • Spiteful_Gremlin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Did you have backups set up for your mint installation? Depending on how long its been, restoring via timeshift might be worth a shot. I’m relatively new to Linux so idk if that could fix it.

  • myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    How did you install PCSX2? The fact that you are launching it through Cartridge makes me a little worried that you are using the windows version. Try the AppImage or Flatpak packages and see if you have any improvement (assuming you aren’t already using those)

    • Squizzy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I got the flatpak initially, I realised it was a few releases behind current and got the appimage direct. For whatever reason, the flatpak version is now current in my manager.

      Another oddity, opening in steam blocked my dualsense from being recognised by pcsx2 despite steam seeing it and pcsx2 seeing it when launched directly or through cartridge.

      • phar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Honestly I recommend the version made specifically for your distro. I haven’t had the best luck with flatpak but the ones made for Debian, rpm, etc always work great

    • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Lutris has an option to act essentially as a frontend for pcsx2, so in theory it should be a Linux version, but I have also struggled in the past with lutris’s versions of things like emulators not having the right permissions to run, since they are a sandbox in a sandbox.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes, I swapped to a US one when I saw a game was marked as US. I thought that kicked it off so I reset to the default swttings and selected the bios folder again