• ShinkanTrain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    That one is even more goatse looking than the N-Gage

  • Mrkawfee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Nokia was the Casio of mobile phones. Sad it couldn’t keep up with the smartphone era.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Nokia was purposely sabotaged by Stephen Elop.

      Elop was a Microsoft employee who moved to Nokia to become their CEO.

      Elop scrapped Meego as well as the rapidly-improving and highly promising Symbian OS that Nokia had, killed internal projects that used Android, and went all in on Windows Phone 7, a completely unproven platform that just happened to be from his ex employer.

      After the market really didn’t like that, Microsoft was able to buy Nokia for a bargain price ($4.6bn), and Elop was given a €18.8m bonus.

      Curiosly, that bonus works out as €1 million for every €1 billion that was wiped off Nokia’s market cap during his time as CEO. But I’m sure that’s just a coincidence…

      When he was asked for the good of the company to take a smaller bonus, Elop said that he couldn’t.

      After the deal to buy Nokia went through, Elop moved to a different cushty position within Microsoft.

      Nokia didn’t really fumble smartphones. They were purposely ran into the ground by Microsoft so they could use a powerful brand name as the the thing end of a wedge to take over the phone market, without having to pay much for it. Then Microsoft fumbled it from then on out.

      • slacktoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Classic Microsoft. Never trust a Microsoft anything really.

    • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They chose windows os over android. It was their downfall. The amazingly designed phones we could have had if they would have used Android instead… I miss my old Nokia phones, all of them but especially the 3310.

      • Nugscree@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Windows OS was the better OS as the time, ran great on low spec hardware, and the tile system and integration of apps was a a lot better than anything Android or iOS has to offer at the time. The downfall was hardly any apps, changing the OS so much every update that the people that were developing left the eco-system because they where fed up of having to change their apps again, and hardly any first party apps. The promise that you could run Android apps on your Windows phone device was never delivered. Also Steve doubling down that he was too busy to use apps so why would you want them on your phone thing.

        I still love my Lumia and turn in on from time to time

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    They released a crude version of the model in the thumbnail. It was the 5510.

    • sushibowl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I had one in high school. The design was kinda gimmicky but the phone had good features for its time. it had an FM radio receiver, and I remember you could even transfer MP3 files onto it, although it was a hassle to do so.

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Anddd now we have boring slab design, thanks Steve Apple.

    But there are tries to make flip phones again with bendy screens - too fragile I think.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The biggest problem with that is sadly the most functional design also happens to be the most boring.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Ok, but that webpad genuinely seems way ahead of it’s time. I want a webpad, and I’m 1000000% sure it’s software is so out of date it would be like running windows 3.1 today.

    Still though. How awesome does the webpad look?

    • latenightnoir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Nokia were doing insanely awesome things with their hardware, beyond basically building phones which were impervious to standard human idiocy (hi, I am an average human idiot).

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Nokia were crazy back in the day but I think people may remember them a bit too fondly. I remember how whenever there was some new tech or idea they would absolutely trickle them out just to try and squeeze as much money out of you as possible. If there were two new pieces of tech they’d release two phones, with each of them having one of the new pieces of tech. Back in those days they just refused to make the absolute best phone possible. That’s one of the biggest changes that came from the iPhone.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You not think it could’ve been a cost saving measure too though and that putting the two new pieces of tech in one phone would’ve made it too expensive for anyone to buy

      • RiceManatee@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As a Nokia Mobile Phones employee in the mid 2000s, I can confirm this was indeed the case. The US wouldn’t pay over $100 for a handset, and Nokia was already losing money on hardware in the phone sale to have it subsidized by network providers. Nokia wanted to add tech and capability, but the high end stuff didn’t sell at a profit and carriers wouldn’t sell phones that were more expensive than their customers would pay. Apple was an exception due to marketing as “premium”.