• BadmanDan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    I thought the entire point was to keep Trans people away from the kids? How is an adult only bathroom affecting kids? This some Jim Crow type shit

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 days ago

    Has the orange arse even hit the seat yet? People were really fucking fast with throwing out all their pretense of progressivity.

    • jeffw@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      Anti-trans laws have only increased in recent years. Having a Republican president won’t impact state legislatures and their momentum on this

    • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The Christian nationalists have been waiting for the second coming of their messiah (Cheeto Jesus), and US society hasn’t moved past the times of burning witches and Christian crusades, so they are just getting warmed up for the real battle.

      https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=P83DMziX1gA

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    Why do we still deal with gendered bathrooms in 2025?

    Just get a specific urinal room, and mark the rooms with stalls as “WC”.

    • ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      Interestingly, SEATAC airport has started doing exactly that in (at least Concourse D). It’s one big long hallway with sinks on one wall and floor-to-ceiling doors for the toilets. And a separate room off to the back with a sliding door for urinals. They’ve got enough toilets that wait times aren’t too atrocious

    • hddsx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      I agree with you in theory, but as a dude who has had to take a dump after a long flight I really appreciate the shorter line

  • treadful@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Looking at the bill text for HB-121. Looks like the “covered entities” can be sued if they even grant permission to someone to use a restroom that doesn’t match their sex. Or if they don’t “take reasonable steps to prohibit” them from using the facilities, whatever that means.

    It also doesn’t mention how one might determine another’s sex. Should get spicy.

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 days ago

    I wonder how the history books will look back on this. Will there someday be a Rosa Parks of pooping?

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Find these lawmakers lawns, those can be your new gender neutral bathrooms. 💩