• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is zero evidence of any damage done to Iran. There is no satellite footage, no videos of the explosions. There is nothing. When Iran attacked Israeli base we had actual hard evidence of what the results were. One has to be an incredibly credulous rube to believe that Israel and Yankeestan were able to attack Iran when they’re unable to provide any evidence of that. You’re such a great illustration how effective propaganda can be on people who are incapable of critical thinking.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          No, I think Yankeestan would release footage of that if they actually hit something. Just like Iran released footage of the base in Israel when they hit it. If you’re dumb enough to just read unsourced statement with zero supporting evidence and believe it uncritically, then what else is there to say about you. I’m guessing D stands for dufus.

          • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 days ago

            So you’re going off a lack of evidence? Seems shaky. Why would the US disclose it’s satellite intel capabilities for an Israel PR win?

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 days ago

              What’s shaky is making bombastic claims without a shred of evidence to support them. I love how you’re. trying to twist that backwards. You made the claim, you provide evidence for it. That fact that you believe things without need for evidence shows that you’re not a serious person.

              • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 days ago

                I did provide evidence, you didn’t. You have not provided evidence yet, if I believed you I’d be believing things without evidence.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 days ago

                  Evidently you don’t understand the concept of evidence. An article that says trust me bro is not evidence. Evidence would be satellite imagery of the site that was supposedly attacked which doesn’t exist. Hope that clears things up for you.