Things didn’t end well for the last guy…

  • Madison420@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Opm holds 90 days in reserve, appropriations usually issues another 90 if needed, add another 90 days by zero interest loan and you have pay for approximately 270 days.

    Currently opm projects no non payment, stop doomsaying when this happens periodically like clockwork.

    Ed: also distinctly different from slavery given the voluntary nature of employment. It’s bad, it isn’t however “literally slavery” no matter how hard you clutch your pearls.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I literally quoted you a news article that says that they will work without pay in the event of a shutdown. Why are you pretending the opposite is true?

      • Madison420@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The TSA who say that literally Everytime? The TSA that doesn’t control their own payroll? That one?

        2018

        https://www.cbsnews.com/news/government-shutdown-affect-air-travel/

        Most TSA workers, about 95%, are considered essential, and would therefore remain on the job in the event of a shutdown — but without pay — TSA administrator David Pekoske said in a post on X.

        Guess how many did not get paid.

        2013

        https://www.dhs.gov/archive/news/2015/02/25/tsa-workers-deserve-more-iou

        A shutdown for the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) means that most of our employees would still continue to come to work, without receiving a paycheck for that work until the shutdown ends.

        Guess how many did not get paid.

        A baited hook does not necessitate a bite, sometimes people just say shut to scare you and this is one of those times.

        Notably, I can’t help but notice you aren’t calling it slavery anymore. Have we backed away from that ill thought out and obscenely offensive analogy?

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Guess how many did not get paid.

          Guess how many did not get paid.

          Since you didn’t provide any sources for whether or not they did get paid after that or how long it took, I have no idea.

          Notably, I can’t help but notice you aren’t calling it slavery anymore. Have we backed away from that ill thought out and obscenely offensive analogy?

          I called it slavery a couple of comments ago. Am I supposed to use the word in every comment?

          It feels like you’re just trolling now. Especially that last part.

          • Madison420@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            They all get paid, they just might not be paid on time which is not in fact slavery.

            That would be the point in guessing or better yet finding out on your own that they in fact did get paid because not paying people is fraud. Some agencies used their budget surplus to keep paying employees others like the TSA who are poorly managed so far as I’m aware have not.

            If that’s your decision, it’s not one I would make though.

            Everything you could really want to know about how shutdown pay works is in this PDF by the OPM.

            https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/furlough-guidance/unemployment-compensation-for-federal-employees-fact-sheet-december-2018.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiF0bb1z7eKAxUVv4kEHXluBB8QFnoECA4QAQ&usg=AOvVaw1Xze9BbLSxX50O68D3vREe

            No, I’m trying to get you to accept calling inconvenience slavery is a bit too far.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Not getting paid on time when you live paycheck-to-paycheck is not “inconvenience.” You must live quite the privileged life to think so.

              No, I’m trying to get you to accept calling inconvenience slavery is a bit too far.

              By needling me for not mentioning it in the last two comments? Try in a different and better way.

              • Madison420@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                I hate to tell you, that’s an inconvenience not literal slavery.

                You must live a privileged life to compare forced servitude and plays at genetic inferiority to not getting paid.

                Yes.

                Try in a different and better way.

                I don’t need to, you’re still defending your point which is that not getting paid is literally slavery.

                Check yourself, no one is selling their children nor themselves down river. Like how is the fact it is objectively offensive to compare the two not altogether glaring to you?

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  49 minutes ago

                  Again, living paycheck-to-paycheck and then not getting paid is not an inconvenience. How do you not know that?

                  It’s a way to get your house foreclosed on and a way to have to decide between electricity and food.

                  Have you really never been in that sort of financial situation?