• GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I feel like for that something more like a roomba that is specialized for a task and more importantly not shaped like a human is the best option there. I feel like having your labor robots be human fascimilies is kinda weird. Like Rosie the Robot from the Jetsons is basically a slave. She can make quips! I’d feel weird having a humanoid robot like that taking orders from me.

    • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sorry, I assumed roombas were robots. I didn’t mean humanoid robot exclusively. Honestly, I’d rather have a grey goo nanobot fleet that could shape change.

      • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Fair enough. I’m a sci fi brained nerd and humanoid robots in Sci fi always bugs me unless it’s something like Data where the purple was to see if you could make a human robot. Otherwise just have a child.

    • Z_Poster365 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There are tasks only humanoids can do, like get boxes off of high shelves, open them and move things around. Idk there’s a million varied aspects of domestic labor and only something tall with at least two limbs with good manipulation and dexterity could achieve

      • GalaxyBrain [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s because we designed houses for human use. Redesigning kitchens with built in robot parts that has a differen design than a standard kitchen meant for human use is way more likely and practical than bipedal robots designed like humans.