• Solumbran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    5 days ago

    “Reflective of its time” so of a time where being offensive and discriminatory was seen as fine or even cool. The show is more offensive than the first Star Trek that was decades earlier. Being offensive has nothing to do with the time period, if people were fine with it, it doesn’t mean that it is fine and not offensive.

    And this show was mostly made of jokes targeting a minority or showing horrible behaviours as funny. Seems like enough to call it offensive.

    • verdigris
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      This is simply not true, at least for the vast majority of the show. Any jokes that might be read as punching down are generally being told by characters who are themselves the actual butt of the joke. Example: the episode where Jerry and George keep getting misinterpreted as being a gay couple. The jokes are all built around their embarrassment about the fact, and the punchline is never “lol gay people exist”.

      • egrets@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think your defense is true in broad strokes, but Seinfeld definitely parodies LGBT+ folk very directly and repeatedly. The hyper-aggressive hyper-camp gay couple who target Kramer, the worries from Jerry about being seen wearing a fur coat because people might make assumptions about his sexuality, the “female version of Jerry” that George dates and worries about how it’s perceived, Jerry’s handbag, and a hundred less plot-pivotal jabs which really do add up.

        Some of those are pillorying the main characters, saying that the concern from the characters is petty and ridiculous, and others less so. As I see it, they aggregate into what feels to me like punching down. You do still need to view it in the timeframe and social attitudes in which it was written, too, but I don’t think it earns total carte blanche. “Tasteless” might be a balanced conclusion.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        That episode is the best argument for why it’s homophobic to be angry/offended about being thought to be gay.

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Can I get some specific examples of the jokes from the show that you find offensive?

      • Solumbran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago
        • Jerry going and telling the “stupid immigrant” in front of his apartment what to do with his life, and the guy obviously listens because he’s a stupid immigrant who has no clue what he’s doing with his life
        • Jokes about Kramer being assaulted by a pedo as a kid
        • Gaslighting in most of the relationships of the men
        • Main characters drugging people secretly
        • Various sexual assault jokes

        And a lot of other things that I’m too lazy to list

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago
        1. The over repetition of lines is offensive to comedy.
        2. The “not that there’s anything wrong with that” episode.

        It’s not that bad for shows of that era though.