• farmer is so purposely a nebulous term that draws and exploits popular imaginaries. the word has become meaningless for me. I try to interject “farm worker” into conversations as often as I can.

    having worked in ag for approaching 2 decades from subminimum wage farm worker, to farm manager to tenant farmer to technical assistance provider to service provider, I call the ones that tend to massively accumulate these sorts of payments by an old term: planter.

    they are farmers in the way that George Washington was a farmer. he had a fuck load of land and a bunch of humans in material bondage who did all the work and facilitated the technical understanding. all George did was point and say “tobacco” before going back to his real vocation as a slaughterer of indigenous peoples and land speculator. behind the scenes he played a few paperwork games to receive operational loans and lines of credit drawn against his extensive land and slave holdings, but motherfucker did zero farming.

    under capitalism the people we want and imagine to get assistance for conservation practices, climate forward / sustainability initiatives, positive externalities / ecosystem services, and the general risk-management assistance to grow food for humans in equitable and responsible ways often end up only getting scraps compared to the politically connected planter class. this is not what any of us working in the system want and many of us work to level it as best we can because these programs are a lifeline to broke people trying to do the right thing in an unstable world, but it’s infuriating when these fucks comes in and hoover up money they don’t need to bloat their returns.

  • DeathToBritain [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    not surprised at all. the whole thing is just such an obvious tax loophole to avoid rich mother fuckers bleeding off any generational wealth. even the ones who do own a farm that does anything, which is clearly not a lot of them, they just have migrant labour run the place. none of them are muddy hands real workers of the land types, anybody who has been around the English countryside and seen these fuckers can tell you that

  • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Pay taxes to the British empire -> funding for Israel and 5 eyes bullshit

    Not paying taxes to the British empire -> people dying from exposure and waiting for healthcare

    Idk what I’d do if I were unfortunate enough to be Br*Tish.

    • DeathToBritain [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      no they just own the land as a tax free asset basically. in the UK farmers don’t pay inheritance tax, so just buy a fuck load of land before you die, claim you’re a farmer now, and pass that on

    • D61 [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Literally just zero income, as in, no sales were made.

      A not for profit farm can generate income through some type of activity but isn’t required or expected to make more in income that is needed to cover the bills.