• Cruxifux@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If people had wings and could fly it would be considered exercise and nobody would do it.

      • frickineh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        60 minutes ago

        I was about to be offended and then I remembered how I got out of breath walking up the stairs this morning. (To be fair, I’m anemic af and almost certainly have a touch of long covid, but still.)

      • Cruxifux@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Yes. Burgerlanders are very averse to any level of self improvement that might be difficult. I blame the car culture propaganda more than I blame the people though.

  • ieatpwns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m good on the feathers I read the goosebumps book about learning to fly and it gave me a preview of my trypophobia when R.L. Stine described the feathers growing out of the main characters skin

  • kryptonidas@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    What does that even mean, you have like “four letters” and dna strands of millions long. Like how selective do you have to be. I’m sure you can basically write anything that way.

    Are there entire chunks that are inactive that would give feathers, that at some point gave feathers to our ancestors?

    • Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      All things DNA is full of code that doesn’t get activated and is just passed on anyways

      Gene expression is what they mean by “activated”

      Basically think of it like having a library of instruction books and only grabbing a few of them to do the project that needs done.

    • pancake@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      DNA contains coding and control regions. Changes to the coding regions are rare, most of the evolutionary stuff is happening within those control regions instead. Mutations there are more likely to result in interesting effects by affecting the way genes activate and interact, while the coding regions do the heavy lifting.

      Losing some feature could be as simple as a mutation that permanently switches off the control region of a gene, even if the gene itself and the interactions formerly coded around it still work. Over time, those accumulate mutations and degrade, since they are not useful and therefore evolution doesn’t preserve them, but they are still there. For example, we have an inactivated gene that used to make an enzyme that would break down uric acid. So we get gout, but our ancestors didn’t.

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I agree, this seems pretty misleading. And are there any other feathered animals other than on the dinosaur branch? Because if not, how should the feather DNA even end up in mammalian DNA?? Or maybe feathers are produced by very common differently used genes? But in this case this would be even more nonsensical…

  • Python@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I want the damn feathers for the social aspect! If we were allowed to preen each other, the world would be a better place!