• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I love it how people still trot our wikipedia as a source of truth, go read at the sources I’ve provided in this thread

      • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The Wikipedia article is a summary of many cited sources. There’s academic ones like The Journal of Genocidal Research. There’s a UN report from the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. There’s news reports from Reuters and the BBC. There’s a report from the International Court. Though I’m sure you checked the sources before dismissing the article out of hand.

        No one is saying that there was zero conflict in Donbas leading up to the invasion. But to label it as “ethnic cleansing” without even acknowledging that this claim is widely disputed internationally is at best irresponsible and at worst deceptive

          • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Buddy, what he said was reprehensible and I am not trying to defend his actions or statements. But does it meet the standard of “ethnic cleansing?” The International Court and most of the world says no.