I believe in socialism, but I feel Stalin shouldn’t be idolised due to things like the Gulag.

I would like more people to become socialist, but I feel not condemning Stalin doesn’t help the cause.

I’ve tried to have a constructieve conversation about this, but I basically get angry comments calling me stupid for believing he did atrocious things.

That’s not how you win someone over.

I struggle to believe the Gulag etc. Never happened, and if it happened I firmly believe Stalin should be condemned.

  • Cowbee [he/they]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Socialism, in my opinion, inevitably leads towards Communism if maintained. What matters is which has supremacy, Capital, or Humanity. I am not conflating them, but pointing out that Socialism, in the eyes of Marxists, is simply pre-Communism.

    • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That makes sense! Thank you! I suppose communism can be seen as extreme socialism, in a way.

      (I had to block some trolls before I found your comment, sorry for the slow response.)

      • Cowbee [he/they]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Sort of. Socialism is simply when public ownership becomes the dominant and driving factor of an economy, typically marked by human supremacy over Capital, rather than the reverse. Since markets naturally centralize, they develop unique forms of planning suitable for their industries and sectors, paving the way for public aquisition and planning. Socialism trends towards full socialization, at which point classes cease to exist and as such class oppression ceases to exist, and “money” becomes superfluous, as there is no trade between institutions.

        • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I think any extreme is probably a bad situation. Thank you for clarifying! I’ve got some thinking to do now.

          • Cowbee [he/they]
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Why is an extreme a bad situation? What if said extreme was an eradication of poverty? Eradication of racism? Extremes are not inherently superior to moderatiom, nor is the reverse true.

            If you want a reading list, I have one linked on my profile.

            • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              An extreme version of capitalism would leave the weak and poor to die. And I’m pretty sure that in any financial/political situation you need some sort of constantly adjusted approach. Any extreme would fail to address the nuances (and humanity) of people, we’re not humans after all.