If anybody is still in denial about their Greater “Israel” policy being real.
Buh buh buh, Western media told me annexation of territory is the worst thing ever and countries who do it should be ostracised and destroyed! Now this?!
you don’t understand, annexing territory is only bad if the people living there already speak your language, have a shared history and identity as part of your country, and then vote to ask you to do it
Israel establishes the Reichkomissariat Damaskus and the west doesn’t do anything. Typical
I was thinking about even Adolf only planned a thousand years.
Not eternity, just for as long as Israel exists.
So I guess we’re doing land theft now. Again.
Bibi just gifted the US another forever war.
Respectfully disagree, i think the US is leading this. They are letting netanyahu take credit to save their favorite pet in terms of domestic politics. The US coordinated this with Turkey as well. It is the head of the imperialist snake.
I think US is definitely an actor here, but it seems like there are a lot of different players each with their own goals. The US is obviously the ring leader, but both Israel and Turkey have their own objectives here, and those don’t always neatly align with what US wants. Both Turkey and Israel see this as an opportunity for a land grab, and the US has little leverage to stop them. Furthermore, Israel wants the US to be actively involved so from their perspective doing reckless shit makes sense.
I would not characterize this as incidental; The US absolutely wants Isnt’reali territorial gains because it’s a geopolitical power move for the empire that brings them to Iran’s doorstep just like with Russia, laundered through a rabid dog proxy acting with 100% full support.
I don’t think the US is specifically interested in seeing Erdogan expand territory, and it might actually be something that makes them uncomfortable. But I do think the US will encourage their favorite client ethnostate to seize military control in Syria and continuously carve out a greater Ins’treal from it. That’s always been the Zionists plan, after all… and given the prior legitimization of illegal annexation of Golan by the incoming US admin, I think that will happen at an accelerated schedule. It’s not like any of these empire psychos give a fuck about appearing violent or hegemonic.
I think the US military might be a bit more realistic about their own limitations though. There are many different factions in control of different parts of Syria. The whole place is now an incredibly volatile, and holding territory there is going to be very costly for Israel. Just look at how things went in Iraq and Afghanistan, I see no reason to expect anything different happening here.
Both Iraq and Afghanistan went according to plan as far as I can tell. Both in different ways, of course. Iraq was destabilized which left foreign capital unopposed in their imperialist theft and the US military has never actually left, either. The only reason the US (directly) invaded Afghanistan was to reboot the opium industry which has been funding the CIA since the 1970s. The US military objectively turned Afghanistan into what is probably the biggest narcostate in human history, and only “left” when they needed to move their Grand Chessboard pawns. The US still has not faced any losses or real consequences of those invasions either.
Iraq is now largely under Iranian influence with US position there becoming more precarious by the day. Meanwhile, Afghanistan is now making deals with China and Russia. I’m pretty sure neither scenario was the plan. I think there are real consequences for both invasions for the US because decades of endless wars have demoralized the military. Recruitment is at all time low, and veterans actively discourage people from joining now.
Iraq is now largely under Iranian influence with US position there becoming more precarious by the day.
We both know Iraqis have not been enjoying the invasion and occupation for a long time now. I’m all for strengthening the axis of resistance, but the US is casually ignoring all the calls for an end to the military occupation. I’d love to see the Iraqi government kick out all foreign capital, but that’s not the menu for what is still mostly a puppet regime, even if it is biting at the leash a little. But it’s not the DPRK. Until western capital interests are seriously threatened in Iraq, I don’t see the US having any reason to intervene. I really hope the resistance forces in Iraq start lighting more fires for the US, but I do think they’re being politically hindered.
Afghanistan is now making deals with China and Russia
That’s excellent, but that doesn’t change the reality that incomprehensible amount of money were made from a US-enforced narcostate and laundered through defense contracts for over 40 years. They clearly got what they came for. Even after 25 years of trying, the Taliban will probably never be recognized by the UN (guess who will block it), which makes Afghanistan something of a stateless playground for the empire, at least so far as the fascists are concerned.
I know the Taliban would probably rather ban opium again, but, honest question, do you think the US will do nothing if opium drops back to the levels we saw in 2000? What would that mean for a state economy that has been purposefully welded to drug production? Let’s say Afghan trade with China and Russia were good enough they were sanction proof, will China or Russia go into direct war with Amerikkka in order to protect their partner?
I think there are real consequences for both invasions for the US because decades of endless wars have demoralized the military. Recruitment is at all time low, and veterans actively discourage people from joining now.
You could say the same for the US genocide in Viet Nam, but it’s still the largest and most destructive military empire in human history. I agree the west (US/EU/NATO) is stretched paper thin over all these conflicts. But something we’ve seen since the end of the US withdrawal in Viet Nam is the extensive use of completely expendable proxy forces to accomplish US military goals. Amerikkkan’s only care about their own fascist cracker-ass lives in any war. They can keep their precious unaccountable rapist occupiers safe while encircling everyone else as a trip wire for nuclear retaliation while offloading the cost of human life to Ukraine, Isn’treal, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Taiwan, Japan, Phillipines, Poland, Georgia, etc…
Sure, US and UK military recruitment is shit, even with all the ubiquitous fascist training simulators marketed as video games and hollywood cinema. Both countries seem to be planning to reinstitute forced conscription in the next few years to address this. The vast Amerikkkans still worship their fucking manifest destiny, lebensraum and military. History also bears out how incredibly easy it is to get Amerikkkans into a racist bloodlust at the expense of a couple capitalist rat’s nest skyscrapers, zionist hostages or Chinese people being allowed to peacefully exist. Not to say that will massively drive military volunteering, but Amerikkkans will feel warm and fuzzy while cheering the proxy force du jour.
The consequence is they have to lean on their nuclear arsenal more than conventional force, and that’s obviously more effective anyway.
I could see that. Thanks for explaining.
Meet the next Syrian dictator:Benjamin Netanyahu!
“At least he isn’t shia or christian or alawite” - sectarians right now
Nothing protects that shitty entity full of war criminals from missiles and rockets hitting it anytime they wish. Literally just a few well placed hypersonics can end the entities land and other gains.
Of course, but then Iran could just obliterate Tel Aviv the same way. Either way it’s going to be a trip wire for a full-scale US invasion of Iran, which is exactly what the US wants. We know which way the western propaganda machine will spin. Who will come to Iran’s aid? Keeping Russia tied up in Ukraine leaves Syria and Iran extremely vulnerable.
Yeah, what you are saying is valid. Therefore, the first thing Iran has to do is develop a nuke and conduct a test. I don’t like nukes, but I also live in the real world and it’s necessary for countries like dprk and Iran to have them.
Edit: also have to add the emotional person in me just wants to see the entity destroyed regardless of the consequences.
I agree with that. Iran needs to get off the back foot. The blinding speed of military fascism cannot be underestimated. The “moderate” politics in Iran will blink and it will be too late, just as with Syria.
That said, I don’t blame Iran at all. I do understand why Iran did not want to militarily intervene without Assad requesting help. Even if Assad did formally ask for intervention, look what happened with the Soviets in Afghanistan in 1979. This shit reeks of Op Cyclone. Even 40+ years later there are only about 20 people in Amerikkka who understand that particular piece of history.
Yeah, Iran not getting pulled into Syria is good, especially without permission. What they need to do is make sure israel gets caught in a quagmire in Syria. Israel definitely can’t sustain 20 years taking hits in Syria like the US or the Soviets did. They just don’t have the wherewithal for a ground war where they take mass cals each day.
In 2 days, Syria was toppled, demilitarized, and annexed. I hope the refugees don’t go back, the country is a fucking death trap right now.
