Summary
Donald Trump and Republicans are falsely framing his 2024 election win as a historic “landslide” and sweeping mandate, despite the data showing otherwise.
Trump won the popular vote by just 1.6%, the smallest margin for a winning president since 1968, and his 307 electoral votes rank low in U.S. history.
Crucial Senate and House gains were limited, with Republicans relying on gerrymandering for their narrow House majority.
This exaggeration of victory serves to justify potential power expansions, but the facts debunk claims of an unprecedented or overwhelming mandate.
I quote the lyrics of the ABBA’s song: “The winner takes it all - The loser’s standing small”. And this is the truth: in a few years, no one will ask how DT won the election. He simply won and has a strong mandate to pursue his policy. - n’est-ce-pas?
That really doesn’t make me feel that much better about it, but I guess we’re mostly trying to find the corn in the shit on this one, so thanks?
Maybe if we correct the Republicans they’ll listen. Yeah, that’ll work.
Republicans are trying to gaslight us by calling Trump’s win a landslide. The point isn’t to correct them; it’s to make sure we don’t believe the lies they tell us.
The problem is that in practical terms it is a landslide, because of the way our shitty system is setup. They have control of all 3 branches now.
It’s not gonna win anything and we shouldn’t act like it will.
Still, no reason not to be correct about it. He’s gonna try and make his delusions national news, so, gotta have the reality out there.
That’s not going to fly when the entire country saw him sweep the swing states. That’s part of the fuckiness of the EC, he only won by a tiny margin but visually state after state went red on the TV.
When I was younger I thought the saying was, “nip it in the butt”
I dunno it always made sense to me.
Anywho carry on
I thought it was “nip it in the butt” as well. Listening to Les Mis 10th Anniversary Edition, the way the gentleman who plays Javert always sounded like “butt” to me as well.
To answer the other commenters question of what would that mean: for years, I thought it meant “nip” like a dog will nip your finger, and “in the butt” was like, “you’d pinch em in the butt” to get them to stop whatever they were doing.
Also thought the line “Burnin’ up his fuel, out there, alone” in Rocket Man was “Burnin’ up the atmos-PHERE, he’s gone” for years before a friend corrected me.
Please explain what nip it in the butt means.
Pinching off a turtle head to prevent shitting your pants.
Lol thanks
It’s time to nip that lie in the bud
Frankly, I’m sick and tired of nipping MAGA lies in the bud every day. It’s been the better part of a decade of this bullshit already… I fucking hate that my countrymen chose this for us for the next four years. Fuck every Trump voter, but a much bigger fuck you goes out to all the jackasses that stayed home on the 5th. You’re complicit, and I don’t give a shit why you think fascism is “okay” as long as you got to punish the Democratic Party for your grievances.
I think the bigger message is that our information environment is totally screwed.
The eye-opener for me was watching our local news station interview college students coo and rave over how “strong” he was and repeat (apparently not) obvious misinformation.
It wasn’t about apathy, not really… He just won an influencer war. And now the CEO of Twitter is basically president…
Wait until the idiots graduate and look for a job. The Orange Bag of Shit holds the record for US unemployment and he has a very good chance of breaking it again.
To be fair, and president would have been screwed over during covid, even if they had “contained” it (which, looking at China, seems highly unlikely).
Exactly, until media reframes this from distraction politics to a call to action none of this matters. Wake me up when we have a functioning government again.
I’ll be focusing locally on building mutual aid networks and contributing as much as I can to local policy and governance.
I’m sick and tired of anywhere near half of the voting public choosing him.
If you voted for Harris, you’re complicit, and I don’t give a shit why you think blue fascism is “okay” as long as it means your rights are protected at the expense of others
Edit: to be clear, I mean complicit in the currently occurring Palestinian genocide and overall maintenance of the status quo
“If you voted for the only other viable option in the election, you’re responsible for Trump” is a very strange claim.
My choice was Trump or not!Trump.
I picked not!Trump. Harris could have been a literal turkey sandwich on a plate, I still would have voted for her. She’s not great, I actually wanted to vote for Bernie Sanders in Andrew Yang’s body, but that’s not gonna happen.
My choice was revolution or status quo.
I picked, and continue to pick, revolution
I picked, and continue to pick, revolution
Contrary to what you may believe, sitting at home and posting on lemmy is not a revolutionary act.
Contrary to your belief, posting on Lemmy isn’t the only thing everyone does…
Like, I’ve been posting a lot to lemmy… This Saturday, I’m going to the range with a close group of family. Before shooting time, we’re doing a STB refresher course. Sunday, over dinner, we’ll be planning out the garden plots on the street.
I’m not interested in making the feds’ job easier by proving myself to you. How about you do something meaningful for your community instead of patting yourself on the back for filling in a useless bubble in support of diet fascism
That’s nice dear. Now run along. The grown ups are talking.
Removed by mod
Well the revolution you picked got us 4 more years of Trump so 😬
Nah, the DNC’s choice to run with Harris, and doing it last minute, coupled with a focus on trying to convince hungry USians that the economy is great, so they should stop whining did it.
revolution? No candidate is or ever will offer revolution. That’s not a choice you can make at the polls
Exactly? While I did vote for De La Cruz since I was there anyway to vote on other races/amendments, the context of this discussion is people who didn’t vote
I mean not voting is not picking revolution either, it’s just handing more power to those who do vote.
Voting at all legitimizes the system, and lulls people into a false sense of satisfaction with having “done their part.” Abstaining is valid
“Some of you may die, but it’s a sacrifice I am willing to make” mfer
^ literally people who voted for Harris, lmao. Sacrificing others for your own temporary safety
Fight the real fight: pedantically correcting conservative strawmen by reading an article about it. Subscribe for 7.99 per month for 6 months, promo code - RESISTANCE
Doesn’t matter. He won the presidency. He has demonstrated his entire life that he will just do whatever he wants and dare the world to stop him. (Narrator: They haven’t.) Now he also has near-complete criminal immunity once he’s inaugurated. He’s already stacking up appointees who are going to follow his orders.
“B-b-but Senate confirmation --” Shut the fuck up. Whoever he wants to be in charge of departments is going to be in charge of departments. Don’t appoint anyone else, throw “Acting” in front of the title, done and done. What is anyone going to do about it? Fucking nothing.
Of course it matters. It doesn’t matter to trump but the public is not trump
15mil who voted last time didn’t this time. 40+ declared they give two shits about what kind of person Trump is. The public does not give af.
If it doesn’t matter enough for anyone to do anything about it, it doesn’t matter at all.
Yes only bloody revolution matters /s
The only way out is through, and the sooner we get to the tipping point the better.
This sounds like accelerationism. It’s all the rage amongst Elon and his ilk. The problem with this is there’s no certainty that we’ll make it through.
France survived the Reign of Terror.
The “public’s opinion” is of very little concern without a threat of violence to back it up.
you go first.
I already am… My community, and myself, have already started putting into action plans to help us through this: Bolstering our mutual aid network, doing first aid classes, hitting the range weekly now, planning our block gardens, etc etc.
I meant that if you’re going to advocate for violence, you go first.
Wny do you think we are doing weekly range days now?
It might be a good idea not to advertise this online, if true.
Maybe the media themselves shouldn’t have been running around talking about the absolutely massive and devastating defeat the Democrats suffered the day after the election… Maybe they should have waited for all the results?
Nahhh… Clicks clicks clicks! It’s all that matters! Money money money!
All corporate media:
Who cares he still fucking won. We are fucked regardless.
They already have power. They don’t need a justification for expansion they’ll just do it.
Yes and no. All power, ultimately, depends on compliance. Even autocracies. There would not have been a “divine right of kings” if kings did not have a pressing need to assure people of their right to hold power.
The “mandate” narrative is aimed at convincing everyone that their objections are in the minority. That even if they stand up and say something, they’ll simply be the odd one out.
Power ultimately depends on violence. Violence can create compliance and vice versa, but the violence and compliance with violence is what’s fundamental. These politicians are very capable of overwhelming violence. It’s a crucial part of their function. It’s been the norm as long as states have existed.
There wouldn’t have been the “divine right of kings” if kings were unable to torture and murder people.
The state’s ability to use violence is entirely contingent on compliance.
There are approximately 1.3 million police officers in the US. That number doubles if you were to throw in the entire US military. That is about 1% of the adult population of the US (~260 million).
The only reason state violence is possible is because people accept it. If every time a police officer tried to arrest someone, an entire neighbourhood rolled out to stop them, no amount of military grade weaponry would prevent a total breakdown of government control. This is what is meant by “policing by consent”. It is the understanding that policing only works because people consent to be policed.
One could reasonably interpret the entirety of the modern era to be the upper class’s quest to push us as close to that point as possible without quite getting there. They’ve already pushed it pretty god damn far with very little meaningful resistance. If the public’s line in the sand is on the far side of fascism then that line may as well not exist at all.
Well, yes, exactly. It’s all about creating sufficient compliance, something they’ve gotten very good at.
In states where he won, it was either a blood-red wave, or barely past 50%.
I mean, yea? What are the other options?
Have you seen the crowd in his 2016 inauguration? It was huuuge. Or how he fit 80,000 people in a 20,000 capacity venue.
People should know by now that he exaggerate everything including the size of his mushroom penis.
Fungi are not amused by association with Trump’s penis.
Wait, did a major outlet just use “lie” in its headline?
I’m impressed. Even for an op-ed.
Anyway, this cannot be repeated enough. I’m already sick of people trying to say it’s “historic”, it’s a “landslide”, etc…give me a break.
Who cares about the label? The only descriptor that matters is “President-elect Trump” and that one is not in dispute. The rest is either semantics or copium that doesn’t impact anything in a material fashion.
Well, I can only speak for myself in that terms and facts matter. And I’m not one for letting fascists frame the narrative; they’ll keep pushing the Overton window and pushing and pushing…
That’s pedantic. They won the trifecta of government. The definition of landslide is academic at this point.
the point is to wake us up to that our resistance coalitions needn’t be small
resistance coalitions
Good luck with that. The last chance for an organized resistance was the 90’s before we put in mass surveillance. It’s game set and match at this point. The only chance now is maybe the hardcore blue states succeed, but that didn’t end well last time either.
the best time was 25 years ago. the second best time is right now. it’s a lot like planting a tree.
A resistance coalition isn’t insurrection when it’s a left leaning coalition.
The “resistance” is ineffective and fractured because its supposed leaders are largely genocidal.
who? name names. who are these resistance leaders aiding in genocide. and don’t say joe biden. if you say joe biden you don’t understand what we’re talking about.
this is a decentralized movement of care. any weakness we have is that we’re uncoordinated because we lack any leadership
It might only be pedantic/academic if the term was only being used in an educational setting. Instead, it’s bandied about nearly every day since the election, and it does need to stop.
It’s not academic, it’s relative to the various examples he cites in the article
