• Imacat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 hours ago

      MTG has a ton of in game lore to build from. Just feels like a cash grab to start pulling in other IPs.

      The LOTR set also had some really overpowered cards and mechanics. The One Ring is still the most common card in modern.

      The chud types were also pretty salty about black Aragorn and there’s no shortage of those assholes in the MTG community.

    • Josephine_Spiro [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Every expansion that is based on an IP like lord of the rings in another expansion that doesn’t build on the lore of magic the gathering. Wizards of the coast are also starting to do more crossovers in the future, which again makes the problem worse. Its a case of the company prioritizing short term profit from a IP linked set over the long term experience of the player base.

      • LeZero [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Lord of the Rings and the Forgotten Realms are fine, they take up a set that could be a new plane or an expansion of an existing one but at least it’s thematic sword fantasy. But add to that, Fallout, Warhammer 40k, Doctor Who, Transformers and some I probably forgot, it starts to be a bit much (most of those are Commander only I think, but still…)

        If that was all restricted to Secret Lairs, low volume, collector bonuses, it wouldn’t be a big deal, but no, you need to have Optimus Prime fighting a Hive Tyrant

      • CarmineCatboy2 [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 hours ago

        And to be clear, it’s not like people are psychotic about the crossovers. Pretty sure the reason is that Hasbro is doing an extreme number of them.