Image is of the King of Morocco meeting with John Kerry (a species of demon that plagued Hexbear in the misty past).


This preamble comes courtesy of @LargePenis@hexbear.net:

Morocco (Al Maghrib), or more officially the Kingdom of Morocco (Al Mamlaka al Maghribiya), is a country located in the northwestern edge of the African continent. The name Morocco comes from the Spanish name Marruecos, which itself comes from the name of the city of Marrakesh. In Turkish for example, Morocco is known as Fas, mainly because Turks knew the land of Morocco through the city of Fes. Morocco is regarded as part of the Arab World and Arabic is the main language amongst the population, with French and Berber languages also widely spoken in the country.

Morocco was the home of mostly Berber tribes until the Muslim conquest and the subsequent Arab migrations in the 700s under the Umayyads drastically changed the character of the country. A Berber commander, Tariq ibn Ziyad, would later cross the Strait of Gibraltar (Jabal Tariq) from the northern shores of now-Morocco and conquer Andalusia, which remained under Muslim rule for nearly 800 years. The country emerged as a significant regional power during the Almoravid and Almohad dynasties in the medieval period, known for their contributions to architecture, philosophy, and trade across North Africa and southern Europe. The current ruling dynasty of Morocco, the Alaouite dynasty, came to power in the late 1600s. The Alaouites claim descent from the Prophet Muhammad through his grandson Hasan ibn Ali, giving them religious legitimacy and political authority in the region. Despite the Shia-coded claim to legitimacy, the Moroccan royal family and the population mostly follow the Maliki school of Sunni Islam.

In the early 20th century, the Treaty of Fez (1912) created the French Protectorate of Morocco, negotiated largely without input from the Moroccan people. Moroccan lands were completely divided under French and Spanish zones, with thousands of colonists pouring into the country. The royal family frequently collaborated with colonial powers, suppressing local resistance movements and prioritizing European interests. Prominent anti-colonial uprisings, like the Rif War (1921–1926), were met with brutal crackdowns, enabled by Western-backed forces. Post-independence in 1956, Morocco maintained close ties with its former colonizers, fostering economic dependence on France and Spain. The monarchy’s alignment with Western geopolitical interests often undermined Pan-African and Arab unity movements.

During the Cold War, Morocco positioned itself as a staunch ally of the West, marginalizing leftist and nationalist factions within the country. The Green March of 1975 was a Moroccan state-organized movement to assert control over Western Sahara, a territory decolonized from Spanish rule but still awaiting self-determination. This march, supported by Western powers, particularly the United States, is often criticized as a colonial expansion disguised as a popular movement. By settling Moroccans in the disputed territory, the march disregarded the Sahrawi people’s right to sovereignty. U.N. resolutions on Western Sahara have seen limited enforcement, largely due to Morocco’s Western alliances shielding it from accountability. Western-backed security and intelligence partnerships continue to be the cornerstone of Morocco’s repressive nature towards any anti-colonial and leftist movements. In 2021, Algeria again severed diplomatic ties with Morocco, citing hostile actions and concerns over Morocco’s ties with Israel, which Algeria views as a betrayal of pro-Palestinian solidarity. The two countries have mostly clashed over the issue of Western Sahara other than a short war in the 60s over a border dispute, with Algeria continuing to support the Sahrawi independence movement.

Morocco’s relations with Israel have historically been discreet but significant, rooted in the presence of a large Moroccan Jewish diaspora in Israel. Former King Hassan II played a significant behind-the-scenes role in fostering covert ties between Morocco and Israel during his reign. King Hassan II is reported to have allowed Israeli intelligence access to critical information from a meeting of Arab leaders in Casablanca in 1965, which may have helped Israel prepare for the Six-Day War in 1967. His government provided a platform for discreet diplomatic exchanges and intelligence-sharing, including Morocco’s facilitation of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat’s visit to Israel in the 1970s. In 2020, Morocco formally normalized ties with Israel through the Abraham Accords, brokered by the United States, in exchange for U.S. and Israeli recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara. Diplomatic and trade relations have since deepened, with agreements in fields like defence, agriculture, and technology. Despite official ties, Moroccan public opinion remains largely sympathetic to Palestinians, but such opinions are rarely considered by the royal family.

Morocco’s future is split between ambitious global aspirations and permanent domestic issues. The country’s co-hosting of the 2030 FIFA World Cup with Spain and Portugal is seen as a significant opportunity to showcase its shiny infrastructure and global presence. However, these achievements are often overshadowed by criticisms of its political culture, including the monarchy’s ceremonial practices, such as the humiliating tradition of publicly kissing the crown prince’s hand. Allegations surrounding King Mohammed VI’s personal behavior, including incidents of public drunkenness and alleged homosexuality continue to be a hot topic within opposition circles.


Please check out the HexAtlas!

The bulletins site is here!
The RSS feed is here.
Last week’s thread is here.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel’s destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia’s youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don’t want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it’s just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists’ side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR’s former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR’s forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster’s telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a ‘propaganda tax’, if you don’t believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


  • vegeta1 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Hear trump doing that 25% tariff on mexico. Don’t they exchange half a trillion in goods? No way this goes through right?

  • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    spoiler

    https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/myanmar-rebel-army-ready-dialogue-with-junta-with-chinas-help-2024-11-26/

    Nov 26 (Reuters) - An ethnic minority army that is part of formidable rebel alliance fighting Myanmar’s ruling military has announced its willingness to hold talks with the junta after a year-long battle along the Myanmar-China border.

    The Ta’ang National Liberation Army’s (TNLA) decision, announced late on Monday, comes as powerful neighbour China puts pressure on rebels amid the rapid degeneration of the military, which Beijing has long seen as a guarantor of stability.

    Myanmar has been in turmoil since the military ousted an elected government led by democracy icon Aung San Suu Kyi in 2021, sparking a resistance movement that began as peaceful protests and later evolved into an armed rebellion on multiple fronts.

    The TNLA in a statement on its official Telegram channel said it wanted a halt to the military’s air strikes in its region of northern Shan state and expressed its desire for talks and its appreciation for China’s mediation effort.

    “Our civilians are suffering from air strikes and other difficulties. So, we need to find a way out,” TNLA spokesperson Lway Yay Oo said.

    The TNLA is part of a coordinated offensive launched last year called “Operation 1027,” named after its start date, which has become the biggest challenge to Myanmar’s generals since their coup, resulting in their loss of several towns and military posts.

    The other two groups in the alliance, the Arakan Army and the Myanmar National Democratic Alliance Army, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The rebel alliance had previously reached a ceasefire in January with Myanmar’s military during China-mediated talks, but the deal collapsed in June and fighting resumed.

    A spokesperson for Myanmar’s junta did not answer calls from Reuters. China’s embassy in Yangon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the TNLA’s statement.

    Myanmar’s parallel administration, the National Unity Government (NUG), said Beijing must consider the desires of Myanmar’s people when getting involved in the country’s crisis.

    “I want to encourage China not to conduct meetings which go against the will of Myanmar people as they will not be helpful to the country’s peace,” said its spokesperson Kyaw Zaw.

    • mkultrawide [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I don’t know nearly enough about Myanmar to back this up, but the coup and ensuing conflict has always set of my 👁️ Kill Bill alarm sounds. It seems very convenient for whoever might in interested in global heroin production that, at the same time the US was pulling out of Afghanistan and the Taliban was beginning the process of eradicating poppy production again, Myanmar was falling into it’s current state of armed conflict and regaining its status as the world’s leading heroin producer.

      • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I have been watching it closely as I’m convinced the US wants to install libs there and make another Taiwan.

        It’s in the ideal location to take advantage of a region of China(Yunnan) with the most different indigenous groups, the potential for driving separatism and conflict there is higher than Xinjiang now.

        Map of Yunnan’s ethnic groups:

        You know the cia is salivating at that shit.

        • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 hours ago

          They can try, but it’s not the same as Xinjiang or Tibet. For those two, there’s a single non-Han ethnic group that is a plurality (for Xinjiang) or a supermajority (for Tibet). There’s also history, especially for the case of Tibet, where they had an independent polity which modern separatist movements can draw upon no matter how tenuous the link is. Yunnan is too ethnically diverse with the majority being Han anyways. For former feudal polities, you have Nanzhao and Dali, which had ruling Yi and Bai families respectively, so to have a secessionist movement, you would have to somehow rope at least those two ethnic groups plus other ethnic minorities together. At best, you might have a particular ethnic group try to venture off on their own with their own separatist movement, but they would still have to contend that the Han form a solid percentage of the population and that other ethnic minorities might not agree with their separatism.

          Take 16. 16 is here, and here’s the demographics. The Dai by themselves are only around 30% of the population with the Han a little behind and the Hani around 20%. 30% isn’t that much. Now if the CIA was somehow able to convince both the Dai and the Hani to form their own separatist movement, then that might cause more trouble, but it would easily lead to infighting between the two (which separatist movement gets the prefecture?), making them much easier for them to be crushed by the PRC. And as for a joint Dai-Hani separatist movement for a Dai-Hani nation-state, they are two completely different ethnic groups with different languages and cultural customs. Apparently, a minority from both ethnic groups are Buddhists, but that’s pretty much it.

          Having said that, Yunnan is also super mountainous and borders multiple countries with parts that are also fairly mountainous, which is prime territory for insurgency.

        • mkultrawide [any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t know who is actually growing the poppies, as I’ve seen allegations about both sides, but the fact that one of the main rebel group is in the same province where most of the drug production is (Shan State) and are part of what’s call the “Northern Alliance” is also very 👁️, although I believe there’s more evidence of the junta being involved in drug trafficking than the rebels.

    • SamotsvetyVIA [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi has spoken to reporters at D-Chowk, claiming that the PTI’s political leadership is eager to engage in dialogue but a “hidden hand” is overruling their decisions.

      “Their entire leadership is keen on having peaceful dialogues but there is one hidden hand which is controlling the decision-making and has an anti-Pakistan agenda. In my experience, that hidden hand is the root cause of all this chaos,” Naqvi said.

      The PTI convoy, which departed from Peshawar on Sunday, is led by Bushra Bibi, former Prime Minister Imran Khan’s wife, along with Ali Amin Gandapur, the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa chief minister.

      https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2024/11/26/pakistan-protests-live-police-fire-tear-gas-at-ex-pm-khans-supporters

  • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    This is quite a wild strategy. This is Trumps treasury secretary nom btw.

    Disclaimer: it is unclear where this transcript is from. I found it from Joe Weisenthals Twitter: https://x.com/TheStalwart/status/1861151007121559702

    Edit: I do have a question about something he says here. Where is he getting the idea that 40-50% of the cost of tariffs would be absorbed from the dollar increasing in value?

    • FuckyWucky [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      US can have both Chinese imports as well as its own industrial capacity with the help of Government doing stuff socialism-is-when.

      Yea, China has some options, it could allow its currency to depreciate but it would also increase its import costs which will be passed on to its exports.

      It also has trillions of dollars in accumulated reserves which it can use to stabilize its currency for extended periods of time. Even now the Renminbi is on what IMF calls a “crawl like arrangement” where the Central Bank only allows a certain percentage appreciation and depreciation over a period of time.

      It can also increase domestic capacity and consumption instead of exporting but again, US loses access to its imports.

      There is really zero reason to introduce such a shock, it’s not good for anyone. Though I know some may see it as America accelerating its own decline.

      No one knows what final adjustments will look like. But it will 100% not be US reindustrializing without direct Government intervention.

      Its not very different from when India made widely used for informal wage payments higher denomination bank notes illegal. Anyone with atleast a brain cell could tell it would be a disaster and there was no legitimate reason to do it. It was just to show how “strong” of a leader Modi was.

    • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 hours ago

      there’s an old Soviet nuclear strategy called escalate to deescalate

      doubt

      but I know who has used that phrase, the apologists for the US-“Israeli” genocide of Palestine

    • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The US will never reshore industry.

      Though this does tell me what I suspect, that the idea of the tariffs is more to try and squeeze concessions from China, Mexico, et al and not actually implement them or implement them for long.

      • Parsani [love/loves, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        It’s a pretty open description of how these policies are used to subjugate other countries to the US’ will (and why that’s a good thing).

        From what else I know about this guy, he has described trumps proposals as “maximalist” and he wants to moderate it a bit, so I’d expect it to not be as drastic as trump says. I assume Trump will force Canada and Mexico to sign some new trade deal after he rips up the old one, and use the threat of tariffs as leverage, but I feel like far more tariffs on Chinese goods are coming and will be here for the long term whether a Dem or republican is in office.

  • CthulhusIntern [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You know what would be the funniest thing the Onion could do with Infowars? Just straight-up, high quality reporting. Like, Pentagon Papers type shit.

  • totalyNOTaPIRATE [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    14 hours ago

    A Third Woman Died Under Texas’ Abortion Ban. Doctors Are Avoiding D&Cs and Reaching for Riskier Miscarriage Treatments. Thirty-five-year-old Porsha Ngumezi’s case raises questions about how abortion bans are pressuring doctors to avoid standard care even in straightforward miscarriages. by Lizzie Presser and Kavitha Surana. PROPUBLICA Wrapping his wife in a blanket as she mourned the loss of her pregnancy at 11 weeks, Hope Ngumezi wondered why no obstetrician was coming to see her.

    Over the course of six hours on June 11, 2023, Porsha Ngumezi had bled so much in the emergency department at Houston Methodist Sugar Land that she’d needed two transfusions. She was anxious to get home to her young sons, but, according to a nurse’s notes, she was still “passing large clots the size of grapefruit.”

    Hope dialed his mother, a former physician, who was unequivocal. “You need a D&C,” she told them, referring to dilation and curettage, a common procedure for first-trimester miscarriages and abortions. If a doctor could remove the remaining tissue from her uterus, the bleeding would end.

    But when Dr. Andrew Ryan Davis, the obstetrician on duty, finally arrived, he said it was the hospital’s “routine” to give a drug called misoprostol to help the body pass the tissue, Hope recalled. Hope trusted the doctor. Porsha took the pills, according to records, and the bleeding continued.

    Three hours later, her heart stopped.

    The 35-year-old’s death was preventable, according to more than a dozen doctors who reviewed a detailed summary of her case for ProPublica. Some said it raises serious questions about how abortion bans are pressuring doctors to diverge from the standard of care and reach for less-effective options that could expose their patients to more risks. Doctors and patients described similar decisions they’ve witnessed across the state.

    It was clear Porsha needed an emergency D&C, the medical experts said. She was hemorrhaging and the doctors knew she had a blood-clotting disorder, which put her at greater danger of excessive and prolonged bleeding. “Misoprostol at 11 weeks is not going to work fast enough,” said Dr. Amber Truehart, an OB-GYN at the University of New Mexico Center for Reproductive Health. “The patient will continue to bleed and have a higher risk of going into hemorrhagic shock.” The medical examiner found the cause of death to be hemorrhage.

    D&Cs — a staple of maternal health care — can be lifesaving. Doctors insert a straw-like tube into the uterus and gently suction out any remaining pregnancy tissue. Once the uterus is emptied, it can close, usually stopping the bleeding.

    But because D&Cs are also used to end pregnancies, the procedure has become tangled up in state legislation that restricts abortions. In Texas, any doctor who violates the strict law risks up to 99 years in prison. Porsha’s is the fifth case ProPublica has reported in which women died after they did not receive a D&C or its second-trimester equivalent, a dilation and evacuation; three of those deaths were in Texas.

    ProPublica condensed 200 pages of medical records into a summary of the case in consultation with two maternal-fetal medicine specialists and then reviewed it with more than a dozen experts around the country, including researchers at prestigious universities, OB-GYNs who regularly handle miscarriages, and experts in maternal health.

    Texas doctors told ProPublica the law has changed the way their colleagues see the procedure; some no longer consider it a first-line treatment, fearing legal repercussions or dissuaded by the extra legwork required to document the miscarriage and get hospital approval to carry out a D&C. This has occurred, ProPublica found, even in cases like Porsha’s where there isn’t a fetal heartbeat or the circumstances should fall under an exception in the law. Some doctors are transferring those patients to other hospitals, which delays their care, or they’re defaulting to treatments that aren’t the medical standard.

    Misoprostol, the medicine given to Porsha, is an effective method to complete low-risk miscarriages but is not recommended when a patient is unstable. The drug is also part of a two-pill regimen for abortions, yet administering it may draw less scrutiny than a D&C because it requires a smaller medical team and because the drug is commonly used to induce labor and treat postpartum hemorrhage. Since 2022, some Texas women who were bleeding heavily while miscarrying have gone public about only receiving medication when they asked for D&Cs. One later passed out in a pool of her own blood.

    “Stigma and fear are there for D&Cs in a way that they are not for misoprostol,” said Dr. Alison Goulding, an OB-GYN in Houston. “Doctors assume that a D&C is not standard in Texas anymore, even in cases where it should be recommended. People are afraid: They see D&C as abortion and abortion as illegal.” Hope visits his wife’s gravesite in Pearland, Texas. Credit: Danielle Villasana for ProPublica

    Doctors and nurses involved in Porsha’s care did not respond to multiple requests for comment.

    Several physicians who reviewed the summary of her case pointed out that Davis’ post-mortem notes did not reflect nurses’ documented concerns about Porsha’s “heavy bleeding.” After Porsha died, Davis wrote instead that the nurses and other providers described the bleeding as “minimal,” though no nurses wrote this in the records. ProPublica tried to ask Davis about this discrepancy. He did not respond to emails, texts or calls.

    Houston Methodist officials declined to answer a detailed list of questions about Porsha’s treatment. They did not comment when asked whether Davis’ approach was the hospital’s “routine.” A spokesperson said that “each patient’s care is unique to that individual.”

    “All Houston Methodist hospitals follow all state laws,” the spokesperson added, “including the abortion law in place in Texas.” “We Need to See the Doctor”

    Hope and his two sons outside their home in Houston Credit: Danielle Villasana for ProPublica

    Hope marveled at the energy Porsha had for their two sons, ages 5 and 3. Whenever she wasn’t working, she was chasing them through the house or dancing with them in the living room. As a finance manager at a charter school system, she was in charge of the household budget. As an engineer for an airline, Hope took them on flights around the world — to Chile, Bali, Guam, Singapore, Argentina.

    The two had met at Lamar University in Beaumont, Texas. “When Porsha and I began dating,” Hope said, “I already knew I was going to love her.” She was magnetic and driven, going on to earn an MBA, but she was also gentle with him, always protecting his feelings. Both were raised in big families and they wanted to build one of their own.

    When he learned Porsha was pregnant again in the spring of 2023, Hope wished for a girl. Porsha found a new OB-GYN who said she could see her after 11 weeks. Ten weeks in, though, Porsha noticed she was spotting. Over the phone, the obstetrician told her to go to the emergency room if it got worse.

    To celebrate the end of the school year, Porsha and Hope took their boys to a water park in Austin, and as they headed back, on June 11, Porsha told Hope that the bleeding was heavier. They decided Hope would stay with the boys at home until a relative could take over; Porsha would drive to the emergency room at Houston Methodist Sugar Land, one of seven community hospitals that are part of the Houston Methodist system.

    At 6:30 p.m, three hours after Porsha arrived at the hospital, she saw huge clots in the toilet. “Significant bleeding,” the emergency physician wrote. “I’m starting to feel a lot of pain,” Porsha texted Hope. Around 7:30 p.m., she wrote: “She said I might need surgery if I don’t stop bleeding,” referring to the nurse. At 7:50 p.m., after a nurse changed her second diaper in an hour: “Come now.”

    Still, the doctor didn’t mention a D&C at this point, records show. Medical experts told ProPublica that this wait-and-see approach has become more common under abortion bans. Unless there is “overt information indicating that the patient is at significant risk,” hospital administrators have told physicians to simply monitor them, said Dr. Robert Carpenter, a maternal-fetal medicine specialist who works in several hospital systems in Houston. Methodist declined to share its miscarriage protocols with ProPublica or explain how it is guiding doctors under the abortion ban.

    As Porsha waited for Hope, a radiologist completed an ultrasound and noted that she had “a pregnancy of unknown location.” The scan detected a “sac-like structure” but no fetus or cardiac activity. This report, combined with her symptoms, indicated she was miscarrying.

    But the ultrasound record alone was less definitive from a legal perspective, several doctors explained to ProPublica. Since Porsha had not had a prenatal visit, there was no documentation to prove she was 11 weeks along. On paper, this “pregnancy of unknown location” diagnosis could also suggest that she was only a few weeks into a normally developing pregnancy, when cardiac activity wouldn’t be detected. Texas outlaws abortion from the moment of fertilization; a record showing there is no cardiac activity isn’t enough to give physicians cover to intervene, experts said.

    Dr. Gabrielle Taper, who recently worked as an OB-GYN resident in Austin, said that she regularly witnessed delays after ultrasound reports like these. “If it’s a pregnancy of unknown location, if we do something to manage it, is that considered an abortion or not?” she said, adding that this was one of the key problems she encountered. After the abortion ban went into effect, she said, “there was much more hesitation about: When can we intervene, do we have enough evidence to say this is a miscarriage, how long are we going to wait, what will we use to feel definitive?”

    • SaniFlush [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It would be irrational to ask nearly powerless people to resist, yet I REALLY want to start seeing the people enforcing abortion bans suffering consequences.

    • totalyNOTaPIRATE [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      14 hours ago

      At Methodist, the emergency room doctor reached Davis, the on-call OB-GYN, to discuss the ultrasound, according to records. They agreed on a plan of “observation in the hospital to monitor bleeding.”

      Around 8:30 p.m., just after Hope arrived, Porsha passed out. Terrified, he took her head in his hands and tried to bring her back to consciousness. “Babe, look at me,” he told her. “Focus.” Her blood pressure was dipping dangerously low. She had held off on accepting a blood transfusion until he got there. Now, as she came to, she agreed to receive one and then another.

      By this point, it was clear that she needed a D&C, more than a dozen OB-GYNs who reviewed her case told ProPublica. She was hemorrhaging, and the standard of care is to vacuum out the residual tissue so the uterus can clamp down, physicians told ProPublica.

      “Complete the miscarriage and the bleeding will stop,” said Dr. Lauren Thaxton, an OB-GYN who recently left Texas.

      “At every point, it’s kind of shocking,” said Dr. Daniel Grossman, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of California, San Francisco who reviewed Porsha’s case. “She is having significant blood loss and the physician didn’t move toward aspiration.”

      All Porsha talked about was her devastation of losing the pregnancy. She was cold, crying and in extreme pain. She wanted to be at home with her boys. Unsure what to say, Hope leaned his chest over the cot, passing his body heat to her.

      At 9:45 p.m., Esmeralda Acosta, a nurse, wrote that Porsha was “continuing to pass large clots the size of grapefruit.” Fifteen minutes later, when the nurse learned Davis planned to send Porsha to a floor with fewer nurses, she “voiced concern” that he wanted to take her out of the emergency room, given her condition, according to medical records.

      At 10:20 p.m., seven hours after Porsha arrived, Davis came to see her. Hope remembered what his mother had told him on the phone earlier that night: “She needs a D&C.” The doctor seemed confident about a different approach: misoprostol. If that didn’t work, Hope remembers him saying, they would move on to the procedure.

      A pill sounded good to Porsha because the idea of surgery scared her. Davis did not explain that a D&C involved no incisions, just suction, according to Hope, or tell them that it would stop the bleeding faster. The Ngumezis followed his recommendation without question. “I’m thinking, ‘He’s the OB, he’s probably seen this a thousand times, he probably knows what’s right,’” Hope said.

      But more than a dozen doctors who reviewed Porsha’s case were concerned by this recommendation. Many said it was dangerous to give misoprostol to a woman who’s bleeding heavily, especially one with a blood clotting disorder. “That’s not what you do,” said Dr. Elliott Main, the former medical director for the California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative and an expert in hemorrhage, after reviewing the case. “She needed to go to the operating room.” Main and others said doctors are obliged to counsel patients on the risks and benefits of all their options, including a D&C.

      Performing a D&C, though, attracts more attention from colleagues, creating a higher barrier in a state where abortion is illegal, explained Goulding, the OB-GYN in Houston. Staff are familiar with misoprostol because it’s used for labor, and it only requires a doctor and a nurse to administer it. To do a procedure, on the other hand, a doctor would need to find an operating room, an anesthesiologist and a nursing team. “You have to convince everyone that it is legal and won’t put them at risk,” said Goulding. “Many people may be afraid and misinformed and refuse to participate — even if it’s for a miscarriage.”

      Davis moved Porsha to a less-intensive unit, according to records. Hope wondered why they were leaving the emergency room if the nurse seemed so worried. But instead of pushing back, he rubbed Porsha’s arms, trying to comfort her. The hospital was reputable. “Since we were at Methodist, I felt I could trust the doctors.”

      On their way to the other ward, Porsha complained of chest pain. She kept remarking on it when they got to the new room. From this point forward, there are no nurse’s notes recording how much she continued to bleed. “My wife says she doesn’t feel right, and last time she said that, she passed out,” Hope told a nurse. Furious, he tried to hold it together so as not to alarm Porsha. “We need to see the doctor,” he insisted.

      Her vital signs looked fine. But many physicians told ProPublica that when healthy pregnant patients are hemorrhaging, their bodies can compensate for a long time, until they crash. Any sign of distress, such as chest pain, could be a red flag; the symptom warranted investigation with tests, like an electrocardiogram or X-ray, experts said. To them, Porsha’s case underscored how important it is that doctors be able to intervene before there are signs of a life-threatening emergency.

      But Davis didn’t order any tests, according to records.

      Around 1:30 a.m., Hope was sitting by Porsha’s bed, his hands on her chest, telling her, “We are going to figure this out.” They were talking about what she might like for breakfast when she began gasping for air.

      “Help, I need help!” he shouted to the nurses through the intercom. “She can’t breathe.”

      Hours later, Hope returned home in a daze. “Is mommy still at the hospital?” one of his sons asked. Hope nodded; he couldn’t find the words to tell the boys they’d lost their mother. He dressed them and drove them to school, like the previous day had been a bad dream. He reached for his phone to call Porsha, as he did every morning that he dropped the kids off. But then he remembered that he couldn’t.

      Friends kept reaching out. Most of his family’s network worked in medicine, and after they said how sorry they were, one after another repeated the same message. All she needed was a D&C, said one. They shouldn’t have given her that medication, said another. It’s a simple procedure, the callers continued. We do this all the time in Nigeria.

      Since Porsha died, several families in Texas have spoken publicly about similar circumstances. This May, when Ryan Hamilton’s wife was bleeding while miscarrying at 13 weeks, the first doctor they saw at Surepoint Emergency Center Stephenville noted no fetal cardiac activity and ordered misoprostol, according to medical records. When they returned because the bleeding got worse, an emergency doctor on call, Kyle Demler, said he couldn’t do anything considering “the current stance” in Texas, according to Hamilton, who recorded his recollection of the conversation shortly after speaking with Demler. (Neither Surepoint Emergency Center Stephenville nor Demler responded to several requests for comment.)

      They drove an hour to another hospital asking for a D&C to stop the bleeding, but there, too, the physician would only prescribe misoprostol, medical records indicate. Back home, Hamilton’s wife continued bleeding until he found her passed out on the bathroom floor. “You don’t think it can really happen like that,” said Hamilton. “It feels like you’re living in some sort of movie, it’s so unbelievable.”

      Across Texas, physicians say they blame the law for interfering with medical care. After ProPublica reported last month on two women who died after delays in miscarriage care, 111 OB-GYNs sent a letter to Texas policymakers, saying that “the law does not allow Texas women to get the lifesaving care they need.”

      Dr. Austin Dennard, an OB-GYN in Dallas, told ProPublica that if one person on a medical team doubts the doctor’s choice to proceed with a D&C, the physician might back down. “You constantly feel like you have someone looking over your shoulder in a punitive, vigilante type of way.”

      The criminal penalties are so chilling that even women with diagnoses included in the law’s exceptions are facing delays and denials. Last year, for example, legislators added an update to the ban for patients diagnosed with previable premature rupture of membranes, in which a patient’s water breaks before a fetus can survive. Doctors can still face prosecution for providing abortions in those cases, but they are offered the chance to justify themselves with what’s called an “affirmative defense,” not unlike a murder suspect arguing self defense. This modest change has not stopped some doctors from transferring those patients instead of treating them; Dr. Allison Gilbert, an OB-GYN in Dallas, said doctors send them to her from other hospitals. “They didn’t feel like other staff members would be comfortable proceeding with the abortion,” she said. “It’s frustrating that places still feel like they can’t act on some of these cases that are clearly emergencies.” Women denied treatment for ectopic pregnancies, another exception in the law, have filed federal complaints.

      In response to ProPublica’s questions about Houston Methodist’s guidance on miscarriage management, a spokesperson, Gale Smith, said that the hospital has an ethics committee, which can usually respond within hours to help physicians and patients make “appropriate decisions” in compliance with state laws.

      After Porsha died, Davis described in the medical record a patient who looked stable: He was tracking her vital signs, her bleeding was “mild” and she was “said not to be in distress.” He ordered bloodwork “to ensure patient wasn’t having concerning bleeding.” Medical experts who reviewed Porsha’s case couldn’t understand why Davis noted that a nurse and other providers reported “decreasing bleeding” in the emergency department when the record indicated otherwise. “He doesn’t document the heavy bleeding that the nurse clearly documented, including the significant bleeding that prompted the blood transfusion, which is surprising,” Grossman, the UCSF professor, said.

      Patients who are miscarrying still don’t know what to expect from Houston Methodist.

      • totalyNOTaPIRATE [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        14 hours ago

        This past May, Marlena Stell, a patient with symptoms nearly identical to Porsha’s, arrived at another hospital in the system, Houston Methodist The Woodlands. According to medical records, she, too, was 11 weeks along and bleeding heavily. An ultrasound confirmed there was no fetal heartbeat and indicated the miscarriage wasn’t complete. “I assumed they would do whatever to get the bleeding to stop,” Stell said.

        Instead, she bled for hours at the hospital. She wanted a D&C to clear out the rest of the tissue, but the doctor gave her methergine, a medication that’s typically used after childbirth to stop bleeding but that isn’t standard care in the middle of a miscarriage, doctors told ProPublica. “She had heavy bleeding, and she had an ultrasound that’s consistent with retained products of conception.” said Dr. Jodi Abbott, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Boston University School of Medicine, who reviewed the records. “The standard of care would be a D&C.”

        Stell says that instead, she was sent home and told to “let the miscarriage take its course.” She completed her miscarriage later that night, but doctors who reviewed her case, so similar to Porsha’s, said it showed how much of a gamble physicians take when they don’t follow the standard of care. “She got lucky — she could have died,” Abbott said. (Houston Methodist did not respond to a request for comment on Stell’s care.)

        It hadn’t occurred to Hope that the laws governing abortion could have any effect on his wife’s miscarriage. Now it’s the only explanation that makes sense to him. “We all know pregnancies can come out beautifully or horribly,” Hope told ProPublica. “Instead of putting laws in place to make pregnancies safer, we created laws that put them back in danger.”

        For months, Hope’s youngest son didn’t understand that his mom was gone. Porsha’s long hair had been braided, and anytime the toddler saw a woman with braids from afar, he would take off after her, shouting, “That’s mommy!”

        A couple weeks ago, Hope flew to Amsterdam to quiet his mind. It was his first trip without Porsha, but as he walked the city, he didn’t know how to experience it without her. He kept thinking about how she would love the Christmas lights and want to try all the pastries. How she would have teased him when he fell asleep on a boat tour of the canals. “I thought getting away would help,” he wrote in his journal. “But all I’ve done is imagine her beside me.”

  • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    From Reuters:

    Diplomacy over Lebanon has focused on restoring a ceasefire based on U.N. Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the last major war between Hezbollah and Israel in 2006.
    It requires Hezbollah to pull its fighters back around 30 km (20 miles) from the Israeli border, behind the Litani River, and the regular Lebanese army to enter the frontier region.
    Israel and Hezbollah have accused each other of failing to implement it in the past; Israel says a new ceasefire must allow it to strike any Hezbollah fighters or weapons that remain south of the river.

    Not hard to see where this goes - ceasefire for some months, Israel continues airstrikes claiming they are not violating the terms of the ceasefire, Hezbollah retaliates, Israel invades again once Trump is president, no Hezbollah troops in the south means Israel can actually advance. Unless Hezbollah is much worse off than what I would guess, it’s hard to see what they get out of this.

    • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Israel says a new ceasefire must allow it to strike any Hezbollah fighters or weapons that remain south of the river.

      So a ceasefire where one party doesn’t have to cease fire?

    • estii [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Israeli wishcasting. These conditions would amount to a complete capitulation by Hezbollah - withdrawal past the Litani and disarmament, abandonment of Gaza, impunity of IOF strikes in the South, allowing return of Zionist settlers to Northern ‘Israel’. I don’t want to diminish the human impact of Israeli terror bombing, but on a strategic level Hezbollah has been outperforming all expectations, increasing their operational tempo, striking deeper into the entity, etc. A ceasefire may well be declared, but if this is the proposal it will hold for an eye-blink.

      I am open to being wrong, I am an outsider and a very distant one at that - obviously I hope I’m not. I have no insight into Hezbollah’s internal situation, but I’m pretty convinced that most of these ‘Lebanese sources’ and members of parliament that get cited for these things don’t either. Hezbollah have effectively built dual-power and are the protectors of Lebanese sovereignty in the popular imagination, I don’t think they’re actually beholden to the decrees of the atrophied Lebanese state apparatus. I take it as political theatre, for the most part.

      Or the situation is terrible. Fuck do I know

      • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I’ve been feeling similar. Hezbollah totally withdrawing from the south seems unrealistic, but it’s really difficult to get an accurate idea of how much fight Hezbollah and the IOF still have in them.

        • estii [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          12 hours ago

          yeah, I feel you comrade. sitting at a safe distance (in the west no less!) boasting someone else’s fighting prowess and spilled blood feels a bit crook, to say the least. we can’t really know. I stand on the assessment with the limited tools and information available, but I’ve been wrong about so much. Hezbollah are certainly projecting strength.

        • kittin [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Maybe Lebanon agreeing to this without being able to hold Hezbollah to any deal they’re not party to is a face saving device for Israel and the fact Hezbollah won’t comply gives them a good excuse to try again whenever they feel they’ve recovered their strength.

    • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Unless Hezbollah is much worse off than what I would guess.

      Territory gains by Israel have started to increase within the last few weeks, and while Hezbollah were able to restrict Israeli territory gains beforehand, it came at a huge cost for them. 1294 Hezbollah fighters have been killed since the Israeli pager terrorist operation and decapitation strike on September 17. If we assume an injury to death ratio of 4.2 to 1 (the same ratio as the total statistics in Lebanon among the civilian population, 3 670 deaths and 15 400 injured), that means 5 434 injuries, for a total amount of casualties of 6729 since September 17. Nearly 7000 casualties in 70 days of fighting… 98 casualties a day on average. And that is without considering the civilian cost with unrestricted Israeli bombings. That is not sustainable long term.

      • estii [they/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Israel finally eking out some territory isn’t surprising, it’s surprising that it took them so long - when the ground invasion started, a lot of e-ink was spilled exhorting people not to despair when Israel made large and rapid territorial gains. My (uninformed) read is that doing those massive controlled demolitions of border villages are allowing them to now advance a bit further. I’d also be more skeptical of numbers in an asymmetric warfare situation, Russia-Ukraine is two standing armies along a line of contact which presumably makes it easier to count and assess these things. My understanding is that the Israelis are having trouble engaging Hezbollah in a significant way, I don’t think the attrition rate or morale situation are comparable. 60 Merkavas in less than 2 months.

        Hezbollah have fighting and fall-back positions layered 10s and 10s of km from the border, and then there are the mountains. They have been preparing for this for 20 years - to hear them tell it, they have more volunteers than they have capacity to train and equip. Every US-Israeli bomb makes as many fighters as it does martyrs.

      • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I mean, Israel has been having significant manpower issues as well. It’s been public for a while that a big chunk of their reservists/on leave soldiers are just refusing to come back to the front, not to mention the dead/wounded. The bombing can continue indefinitely but I don’t know about a ground invasion.

        Do you have good sources on the front in recent weeks? I haven’t been keeping up with it lately.

        • MarmiteLover123 [comrade/them, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The IDF have 169,500 active members and 465,000 reserves, for a total of 634 500 members. Hezbollah, by their own claims, have 100 000 fighters, including active and reserve personnel. The numbers are not in Hezbollah’s favour here in a manpower attrition scenario.

          The updates by this twitter account are usually accurate, a comrade shared it on here a week or two ago, they correctly call attacks as they are happening with regards to Russia/Ukraine, and have some good mapping info on Lebanon/Israel. Don’t worry it’s not some delusional NAFO account, they seem to keep their personal basies out of the reporting and the majority of their following is actually pro Russia.

          • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]@hexbear.netOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Do you believe that the Hezbollah of 2006, which beat Israel, is relatively weaker today than the Hezbollah of today? I have seen no evidence that Israel is doing relatively better than they did in 2006, and only evidence to the contrary.

          • Parzivus [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Thanks!
            Honestly, I’ve been wrong about quite a few geopolitical events in the last few years, so I don’t want to say anything too definitive. Suppose the next few days will reveal whether a ceasefire is happening.

  • Neptium@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The Lie of Singapore

    I have written a lot about Singapore and Malaysia here. Posts, here and there, that showcase aspects of their incestuous relationship.

    But I never really stated explicitly, or more clearly debunk, the pernicious state narratives that both states and their comprador classes vehemently adhere to.

    So I am going to rectify that right now.

    Note: communal and racial are synonyms in Singapore and Malaysian politics. See here for elaboration.

    General Background

    The region was known as Malaya and Northern Borneo, back in the 19th and first half of the 20th century, consisting of the Malay Peninsula and their surrounding islands and the British controlled part of Borneo, but explicitly did not include the Riau Islands, were under Dutch administration or the Southern Thailand provinces, which were seceded to the Thai Monarchy in 1909, even though both regions had Malay majorities.

    This region was sorted in more or less 3 distinct types of administrations, the federated and unfederated Malay Sultanates, in addition to the the protectorate of Brunei, in which over time the role of the Sultans diminished as the power of the colonial British advisers grew. The second was the Strait Settlements, British crown colonies which British laissez-faire Capitalism was allowed to flourish, especially in goods that the British were particularly good at trading (smuggling), opium. The colonies in Borneo, Sarawak and North Borneo Chartered Company (Sabah) was land “given” by the British protectorate Brunei to the British. Unlike in Malaya, Sarawak and North Borneo was also under direct control of the British, and Sarawak in particular was under the rule of the “White Rajah” (White King). Missionary influence especially was prevalent here, which resulted in more extensive use of English and Christianity being the majority in the state.

    The Strait Settlements were crown colonies located in strategic positions within the Straits of Malacca, and were concentrated in the 3 main ports of Melaka, Penang (now officially called Pulau Pinang) and Singapore. These ports were fully controlled by the British and had appointed governors. The infamous one being Stamford Raffles, so-called founder of Singapore.

    Nearing independence in the 1940s and 1950s. Guerrilla warfare was being waged by the Communist Party of Malaya, with membership within their mass organisations nearing 50% of the entire workforce. Furthermore there were unrest in others parts of the Malayan economy. Indian labourers in rubber plantations, Chinese miners in Tin mines, the Malay peasantry facing accumulation by dispossession and oppression by the Chinese capitalists, local Malay landlords, and the general comprador Malay Sultanates and their British advisors.

    Independence was the name of the game, with waves of unrest and decolonization swept across East Asia at that time. In China, in Korea, in the Philippines, in Indonesia and in Viet Nam.

    Malaya was no exception.

    The Official Narrative™️

    We gained independence in 1957 - under the “good graces” of the British, who simply let us free after of course, negotiations by the Malay sultans themselves. One infamous speech in which the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (the elected King) screamed the word “Merdeka!” (independence) 7 times and centuries of colonial exploitation just vanishes! At this point, this independence was only for the Malay Peninsula sultanates, and so logically lead to the official name of the federation of Malaya.

    After a decades spanning communist guerilla warfare, the so-called ‘insurgency’, and British inability to maintain and sustain their prized colony in Southeast Asia, and fear of the so-called domino effect if communists and anti-colonial forces were to win, they came up with the Malaysia Agreement. An opaque document that mainly involved negotiations and consultations with the comprador elite and their masters. It stipulated that the British colonies of Sarawak, the North Borneo Chartered Company (Sabah), Malaya and Singapore were to merge into Malaysia.

    This was to the dismay of the Malays, the British-educated elites in the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) proclaimed, because the indigenous were a minority in their own native land. The Malays, they proclaim, do not want to include Chinese majority Singapore in the federation. Even including Sarawak was contentious, because Sarawak was majority Christian.

    Singapore’s British educated Chinese elite, influenced by the British Labour Party and the Fabian society, formed the People’s Action Party. There was a more radical sect within the party that called for the creation of a unified proletarian state. The party, was in theory, on-board with unification.

    The various state actors signed the agreement in 1963 to form a unified and federated Malaysia.

    However, the official narratives warns us, racial tensions were simmering. The Malays were not giving equal voting representation the Chinese majority in Singapore. The Malays, were also afraid of a secret Chinese communist takeover, precipitated itself by the super-liberal People’s Action Party!

    The Racialised Class Realities laid bare

    Secret negotiations were taking place between the reactionary comprador elements of the PAP and UMNO, even before the signing of the 1963 Malaysia Agreement, of an eventual secession of Singapore.

    The elites in Singapore publicly welcomed the idea of unification, and so the infamous clip of Lee Kuan Yew crying after Singapore being “kicked” from federation was widespread. Little did others know until decades later that it was merely a facade, when he was the head of the clique that lead the negotiations for separation.

    It would be good for Singapore because they would remain in a singular currency market with the underdeveloped parts of Malaya and North Borneo, without dealing with rising labour militancy. Think the Eurozone with the European periphery. As I mentioned before, Singapore’s departure would secure the politial hegemony of UMNO.

    "When the Tunku (the first Prime Minister of Malaysia) first informed Keng Swee in December last year (1964) of his desire to have Singapore “hive off” from Malaya, it generated considerable excitement amongst us first because this showed their realisation that we cannot be fixed in Malaysia and the supremacy of Malay communalists assured forever. Next, it gave us an escape, if there is to be trouble in Malaya with communal clashes over language and other issues. We might in such a rearrangement insulate ourselves from communal conflict which is building up in Malaya.

    “[The] greatest attraction of this rearrangement is our hope to get the benefits of all worlds - the common market, political stability with economic expansion, and autonomy in Singapore without interference from KL. The picture of a prosperous and flourishing Singapore doing better than the rest of Malaysia is most attractive.”

    And here is where the whole story crumbles, from the words of Singapore’s infamous and first Prime Minister himself, Lee Kuan Yew.

    The fake stories about our so-called independence laid bare for what it was and continues to be. Lies, regurgitated by compradors and foreign Capital.

    Epilogue

    This brief exposition of independence was of course simplified and did not include many of the nuances that made up the whole story. From the inclusion of North Borneo, Sarawak and Brunei, disagreements between the various Sultans, the specific amendments to accommodate Singapore’s brief inclusion in the federation, the voting boycotts, racial riots and the Northern Borneo Communist uprisings, and the many grassroots shifts that had occurred by the time of independence and the couples of decades after. Many had to be foresaken for brevity.

    History does not spare the sympathy to give us breaks.

    In my previous characterizations of Singapore, I tried to convey this Europhilia that was/is heavily present in the elite’s unsophisticated and underdeveloped minds.

    Just read their own words -

    Next, it gave us an escape, if there is to be trouble in Malaya with communal clashes over language and other issues

    Who has not had the displeasure of interacting with a white European who has definitely exclaimed that they are not racist, while actively benefitting, supporting and instigating racism? How are these words any different?

    The guardians of so-called “Asian values”, while in actuality mirror their European counterparts in crystal clear clarity. This is recognised by many of the European chauvinists, who often emphasize that the Orientals can only be prosperous if they imitate the West, with Singapore being their prime example.

    Singapore’s role in the world economy is like that of South Korea, Rwanda, United Arab Emirates, or Panama. It is, and continues to be, a colonial outpost of US hegemony. Treat it as so.

    Learn to read through the libspeak that a lot of the Singaporean and Malaysian elites like to shroud themselves in.

      • Neptium@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I kind of jumped the gun a bit but I’ll try make it clearer:

        Unification was what the masses wanted.

        The story is that the Malays (ie. Muslims) were too racist so they had to kick poor Singapore out.

        The propaganda is that this was a unilateral decision and so absolved the Singaporean elite of blame - it was those dastardly “Malays” (the comprador elite of the same British stripe that they also come from).

        The other part of the bourgeois version was that the separation was due to the supposed “Communism” of the Chinese, but rather just intra-comprador infighting between different classes in Malaya. The People’s Action Party were not communists.

        And so the larger goal of this story was to disrupt attempts at anti-colonial unity between different races and classes within the Malayan political economy while at the same time portraying the respective ruling classes of both countries, as supposed “defenders” of their own people (race), but in reality both conspired and collaborated for their own class interests.

        It becomes harder to explain how this story is entrenched and gets played out in Malaysian and Singaporean politics and how these basic facts get muddled without dissecting the history of race in Malaysia and Singapore.

  • SoyViking [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Social fascist has horrible take, gets even more racist

    In an upcoming book Peter Hummelgaard, head of Denmark’s Social Democrat-controlled ministry of justice, recounts growing up as a victim of domestic violence. He is using the account of his childhood trauma to advocate for what he himself terms “a far-reaching proposal”: introducing a so-called “strict reporting requirement”, making it a criminal offence not to report child abuse to authorities. A similar requirement already exists for teachers and other professionals working with children.

    But there is a catch to his proposal, it should be geographically limited to “at risk areas on the parallel society list”. Yes, that is an actual legal term in Denmark.

    These areas, formerly officially termed “ghettos”, are social housing estates officially characterised by residents being significantly poorer and significantly less white than average. The term “parallel society” is a dog whistle targeting Muslims. These areas are portrayed as dangerous, hostile and foreign in public discourse and all the social problems associated with the term are heavily racialised. Residents are treated as second-class citizens by the state with regards to everything from housing law and unemployment benefits to daycare options.

    Hummelgaard has no problem being up front about his racism, he says:

    Whole families are often complicit, as part of efforts to prevent girls and young women from fully integrating into Danish society—fathers, mothers, aunts, uncles, and older siblings alike.

    When asked by state media DR, the Social Democrat-controlled ministry of Housing and Social Affairs had no data indicating an elevated incidence of child abuse in the targeted areas.

    This does not give Hummelgaard pause. He continues his racist screed:

    I believe we have been far too passive for years when it comes to addressing violence against boys and girls in specific communities.

    He defends only targeting racialised housing areas by saying:

    Initially, I have targeted these communities where we already know there is significantly higher crime and a prevalent culture of silence, often involving arbitration councils and imams [referring to a moral panic about mosques mediating in conflicts between community members without involving authorities]. This is why it’s a particularly far-reaching proposal.

    These fucking Rosa-killers are the “progressive” option in electoral politics, you either put these ghouls in office or you get someone who’s even worse.

  • Moss [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Significant progress made on Lebanon ceasefire - France

    Michael Herzog, the Israeli ambassador in Washington, told Israel’s GLZ radio an agreement was close and “it could happen within day …We just need to close the last corners”, according to a post on X by GLZ senior anchorman Efi Triger.

    Hidden in the last paragraph of the article:

    Hezbollah, militarily more powerful than Lebanon’s regular army, has said it is defending the country from Israeli aggression.

    It vows to keep fighting and said it will not lay down arms or allow Israel to achieve political gains on the back of the war.

    So what does this mean? Is Israel exhausting it’s stocks of missiles? Has Lebanon been beaten down to much by Israeli airstrikes to keep going?

    Also if Hezbollah keep fighting, and they will, this doesn’t seem likely to change much. There’s also the likelihood of Israel just not honoring any kind of deal.

    Smarter hexbears please chime in

    • Commiejones [comrade/them, he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Never trust any talk of a ceasefire. It wont happen. isisrael will not stop its genocide in Gaza unless it is forced to. usa will not force isisrael to stop its genocide. The resistance will not stop until the genocide stops. There will be no ceasefire.

      Its a cease fire between Lebanon and isisrael and it is just a PR win for isisrael. It has no value because Lebanon’s government and military aren’t fighting isisrael, Hezbollah is. It will change nothing except isisrael will say “Hezbollah violated our ceasefire so the Lebanese people have no one to blame but Hezbollah for the genocide we are about to commit.”

      Hezbollah isnt involved in the ceasefire talks. The current proposal is that Hezbollah would disarm and leave the border, the Lebanese’s military would take their place and isisrael would withdraw. No mention of Gaza.

    • miz [any, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      psyop to create impression of impending resolution, same way the Biden administration has been “working tirelessly for a ceasefire” for a year and continually promised something would resolve within “the next two weeks” like a dozen times

      if Hezbollah is not party to it then it is theatre

      EDIT: I forgot to say that the purpose of this is to deflate urgency because if people think a ceasefire is imminent they theoretically won’t consider action necessary

    • thethirdgracchi [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      If Hezbollah wants to honor the memory of Nasrallah and not go back on their word, there will be no ceasefire with Hezbollah unless there is also a ceasefire in Gaza. This, as it stands, is a non-starter. Unless Hezbollah wants to capitulate to Israeli demands, the only “ceasefire” the Israelis can get is with “Lebanon” aka the government which is not currently fighting Israel anyway.

    • TomBombadil [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Additionally unless Hezbollah has ceased to tie their struggle to Gaza there is simply no ceasefire with Hezbollah until Gaza is released from occupation.

      From the beginning Hezbollah has been clear about this. The new leadership has also reaffirmed it

    • CleverOleg [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I could see making a “ceasefire” deal with the Lebanese government and not Hezbollah as political cover. Perhaps “Israel” pulls its troops out of Lebanon and stops the bombing campaign. Then when Hezbollah continues attacking the north, the “Israelis” will say that they’re just being peaceful and Hezbollah is attacking them despite a “ceasefire” being signed. And then basically everything goes back to where it was just before “Israel” tried to invade Lebanon.

      But I am seeing reports (particularly on Al-Jazeera) that it’s a ceasefire with Hezbollah, and for that I have no idea. It would be hard to imagine Hezbollah capitulating, but just as hard to imagine Israel ending the genocide in Gaza.

    • carpoftruth [any, any]@hexbear.netM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Is this ceasefire actually a ceasefire or is it capitulation on Israeli terms? The key thing to look for in these stories is if a term of the agreement is Hezbollah pulling back past the litani River. If that is part of the purported deal, it is negotiation of a Hezbollah surrender and not a ceasefire.

      • Twitter source

        Xcancel mirror

        Elias Bou Saab, Deputy Speaker of Parliament, to Al-Mayadeen:

        In the coming hours or days, we will witness the announcement of a ceasefire

        • We will remain cautious because the experience with Netanyahu is not encouraging
        • Information received from the American mediator indicates that the last sticking point has been overcome
        • The committee that will supervise the implementation of Agreement 1701 may expand, but what is currently on the table are the United States and France
        • The committee tasked with supervising the implementation of the agreement is not authorized to work outside the text of Resolution 1701
        • The agreement will lead to the complete withdrawal of Israeli forces to the armistice line and the cessation of aggression and hostilities
        • We have not heard or been offered by anyone that there will be guarantees for any party’s freedom of movement