renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agoThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldimagemessage-square52fedilinkarrow-up1562arrow-down124
arrow-up1538arrow-down1imageThanks for the warning I guess??lemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 17 hours agomessage-square52fedilink
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up27·13 hours agoI really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
minus-squareJusticeForPorygon@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up22·edit-29 hours agoNo one: deranger@sh.itjust.works:
minus-squarePacattack57@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·8 hours agoIt’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
minus-squarederanger@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·edit-27 hours agoShouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then? Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it. If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way. I just don’t get it, logically.
I really hate that “no one:” shit, it often doesn’t make any sense to me.
No one:
deranger@sh.itjust.works:
It’s just a qualifier to insinuate that no one cares about a certain topic and then there’s that one person that brings it up out of no where.
Shouldn’t it be “everybody: <blank>” then?
Nobody: <blank> means that everyone has some feelings about it.
If it’s Nobody and the second line applying to the same thing then the nobody part is false, because the second bit implies that at least one person feels that way.
I just don’t get it, logically.