• Boinkage@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    ·
    1 month ago

    Bloodline doesn’t have to end for that to happen. Even if you have kids, in three generations no one will remember your name or your life. Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents? No one will remember us and it will not be important whether they do or don’t.

    • Mothra@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is very true, and also, the reverse is true as well: your bloodline can end yet you can still be remembered if you did something remarkable enough. I’m sure there are tons of well known figures in history whose bloodlines are no more today

      • Sergio@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 month ago

        One of the things I learned as a scientist is that for any major accomplishment, there are thousands of people who did difficult, necessary, and not-widely-recognized work to make that accomplishment possible.

        • Danitos@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          I like to think that things are even more complicated, as we depend on a lot of people, even if we are not aware of it: random taxi/bus drivers, restaurant/grocery staff, your ISP workers, random factory workers, etc.

          We depend on far mote people than we realize, and not just us but also people working in advancing the limits of human knowledge. We wouldn’t have Einstein without some of his totally unexpected yet unkownly related contemporanies. Following this logic, we wouldn’t have Einstein without his grandparents, and even those grandparent’s contemporanies, and this just keeps going.

          As Lain says, we are all connected.

        • Ledivin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          My favorite example of this was just a few years ago, when the media all reported that a woman had found a black hole. The coverage was all about her and how surprising it was… she was on a team of 6. We all just decided, fuck the 5 other people on her team who all worked together on the project. She wasn’t even a team lead or anything.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents?

      On my dad’s side, actually yes. They died either side of 100 when I was in my early 20s. I’m old enough to remember spending time with them and hearing about their lives. I didn’t meet the other sides, but my maternal grandfather compiled a book about his line which was quite interesting (and this was when one still had to go to the library and search through newspapers, etc. or have them call other libraries to get info).

    • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      yeah and its like whats a bloodline. There is the whole mitochondrial eve thing. I saw a youtube video on genetics and variation and generations and it did not take long for less than 1% of enetics to be in common with an ancestor and they used the british royal family as an examples so pretty inbred to.

    • Oaksey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do you know the names and history of your great great grandparents?

      Yes. I guess permanently moving halfway around the world is notable. Although that also means the next generation will know what their great great great grandparents did.

    • makingStuffForFun
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agree, and I love that.

      Even Steve jobs will be forgotten soon enough. My kids don’t even know who he is.

      Not having to build some bullshit legacy is so freeing.

      I can focus on my version of a good life, and ensure my time with my direct family is fulfilling.

      Everything else is just pointless drama.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah its a fun concept.

      Like imagine you just go back in time and randomly kill a person. Bam, a lot of people never get born, history changes dramatically.

      Having a child is biggest butterfly effect you can have on the space time contiuum. Want more chaos, have more children. LET CHAOS REIGN!

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        But other people fill their roles, with the main difference being just genetics, so probably on average very similar behavior. And most people don’t do anything too exceptional or history changing. So would “ending a bloodline” really be more impactful than say causing a traffic jam, if all it’s really doing is applying a passive RNG shuffle to everything?

  • outstanding_bond@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s so tragic that we have no records of Washington, Tesla, da Vinci, Newton, Faraday, or Kant. If only they’d thought to have kids they might have left a mark on the world.

    • DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This lmao.

      “Being forgotten and replaced” is racist propaganda

      And people will fall for it constantly.

      Pro tip: if a right wing think tank can fear you into making a human life then maybe you are too stupid to responsibly raise children

    • Norin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Nah, I reckon we’re better off for Kant not procreating. That guy gets worse the more you look into him.

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Yep, the only thing that’s lost is any mutations unique to that “bloodline”.

      That rarely happens, and when it does it’s almost always something that wasn’t beneficial to begin with.

      We’re all just different combinations of the same DNA. Some of our ancestors were just isolated enough for already old mutations to become concentrated enough to get expressed in the majority of the population.

      Like, going off memory but there’s like 17 different mutations for eye color?

      None of them cease to exist when they’re not expressed, and they still have the same chance of showing up later.

      The Blue Fugette’s from Kentucky is a great example. The original heads of that family was a French man and an Irish woman who’s bloodlines hadn’t crossed in probably thousands of years.

      But they both had the same rare recessive trait for their blood to be less oxygenated than normal. So their kids had a blue hue. Because they moved to an isolated location with a small amount of other families, their kids with double recessive genes lead to a bunch of blue people in a couple generations after it had spread in the population.

      Even if they had all died out for some reason, it wouldn’t stop another random couple with the resseive genes from meeting and moving to another isolated population.

  • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    My branch of the family tree dies with me. My family name is probably in the rarest few percent (I tried checking previously and got some fraction of a percent, but I don’t know how accurate that site was). Technically, though, as several of us uploaded DNA to various sites, it’s not completely lost in that sense. However, I just don’t care, really; I think it’s weirdly self-important to be concerned with a name or bloodline carrying on like humanity won’t survive without it somehow.

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh yeah, my family name isn’t that rare, but it’s also probably going away locally when I do. I don’t mind though, it’s an ugly name anyway. My wife didn’t take it, her’s is much nicer.

  • davidgro@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 month ago

    My bloodline ends with me, but I have step kids. So kinda yes, but kinda no more than a typical person whose genes do continue but their story is forgotten eventually.

    This really hit me recently when sorting my mom’s belongings and finding a ton of photographs of people I don’t recognize, and having nobody left to ask about who they were, how/if they were related to me, and what their life was like.

      • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Oh man, Coco broke me in the best and most beautiful way.

        My grandpa had Alzheimer’s, and near the end he couldn’t remember anything but if we started singing hymns or Christmas carols he knew he would sing along with us. I never really mourned him properly; by the time he died he’d been slowly disappearing for years, so the funeral was more of a “good, he’s done suffering” deal.

        At the end of Coco I cried harder than I’ve ever cried at any movie. It was like I had all this stuff pent up and never dealt with and didn’t realize it. It all came out in one massive wave of catharsis. It felt incredible.

        Now it’s my favorite Pixar movie.

  • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It happens anyway. It’s possible, but very very unlikely, that within two generations none of your grandkids shares any DNA with you.

  • z3rOR0ne
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Shortsighted take. The concept of legacy is bullshit. The long term effects you have on the world have more to do with reinforcing or negating societal patterns of behavior. Do you encourage or discourage kindness? Do you encouraged or discourage violence? That’s really all that matters.

    Those who receive kindness, violence, etc. are likely to perpetuate it, but could fight that societal reinforcement and potentially change the course of their lives and the way they influence others around them.

    All the different flavors of culture and traditions are simply wrappers over these patterns and are destined to die or change so dramatically that they would be unrecognizable to the practitioners of said culture from the past.

    Your true legacy, the one that is likely to span many generations, isn’t the traditions or artifices of a culture and people long dead, it is the positive and negative behaviors you reinforced through you demonstrating these behaviors during your life.

    Did you build and help community? Did you uplift and protect the most vulnerable amongst you? Did you work towards a world better for the next generation and not just for your children? Ultimately this is the closest people have to an actual legacy.

    One day you and everyone you ever know will die, and the best you can hope for is that you perpetuated kindness amongst those that will take the mantle of humanity forward.

    Legacy is still bullshit though. The reasons for doing right by another person is the goal, not the way towards the goal.