This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agoYou know what, fuck you [un-Jags uar icon]lemmy.worldimagemessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1517arrow-down111
arrow-up1506arrow-down1imageYou know what, fuck you [un-Jags uar icon]lemmy.worldThis is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square126fedilink
minus-squareselokichtlilinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoWhat’s the reasoning behind? Or just a trend?
minus-squarem_f@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·13 hours agoI think it’s just a long-running trend across many different companies towards simplification. Here’s the Apple logo for example:
minus-squareselokichtlilinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoI don’t see it. In this case, I see basically the same since 1977, or being strict, 1998. Unless they go for just " A P P L E " next. It’s, in my view, a big step to abandon a graphic for letters.
minus-squaredrathvedro@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·12 hours agoGotta say, the original Newton logo would’ve looked sick if engraved on the back of a product. Too bad nobody has ever done it.
What’s the reasoning behind? Or just a trend?
I think it’s just a long-running trend across many different companies towards simplification. Here’s the Apple logo for example:
I don’t see it. In this case, I see basically the same since 1977, or being strict, 1998. Unless they go for just " A P P L E " next. It’s, in my view, a big step to abandon a graphic for letters.
Gotta say, the original Newton logo would’ve looked sick if engraved on the back of a product. Too bad nobody has ever done it.