• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      now that you mention it…

      the real question is how long before we just have automated agents sending corporate emails to one another without any human in the loop 🤣

  • Most corporate communications are unnecessarily fluffy to begin with because it makes it look like more work was done. Most of the time I don’t even understand why I’m explaining something and it feels like the only requirement is to have words on a page.

    • xantoxis@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sometimes the only requirement IS to have words on a page. Think about a disaster recovery plan, for example. Now, you probably don’t want an LLM to write your disaster recovery plan, but it’s a perfect example of something where the main value is that you wrote it down, and now you can be certified that you have one.

  • adroit balloon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    beware! soon, it will be able to turn that long email into a meeting!

    • Llewellyn
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And another GPT will participate in it for me. Good.

      • Rose Thorne@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Didja hear, Jeff had a heart attack.”

        “Wait… Jeff was a real person this entire time?”

  • xantoxis@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a legitimate use case for LLM, though.

    Not everyone can communicate clearly. Not everyone can summarize well. So the panel on the right is great for the people on the other end, who must read your poorly-communicated thoughts.

    At the same time, some things must look like you put careful thought and time into your words. Hence, the panel on the left.

    And if people on both sides are using the tool to do this, who’s really hurt by that?

    • hglman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, but there is a real risk here that either the expansion added false details or the summary is wrong, especially the summary.

        • hglman
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not about formality. It is about the introduction of error. Less strict communication is more likely to have such errors introduced.

  • klangcola@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The AI arms race has begun!

    Isn’t this kinda thing happening already in the recruitment industry?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      pretty sure stuff like resume screening is done using machine learning nowadays