Scott Pelley recapped the Cabinet picks of President-elect Donald Trump in the “60 Minutes” opening Sunday, enraging MAGA supporters despite the segment’s recitation of facts. (Watch the video below.)

The summary “is exactly why no one respects the legacy media anymore,” one person complained on X, formerly Twitter.

“Pure Democratic propaganda,” griped another.

Pelley, a correspondent, began by noting “some nominees appear to have no compelling qualifications other than loyalty to Trump.”

He pointed out defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth’s lack of government experience and recent gig as a Fox News morning host; the investigation into attorney general nominee Matt Gaetz’s alleged sex with a minor; and the vaccine skepticism of health and human services nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

“It’s up to the new Republican majority in the Senate to decide whether these nominees are equipped to represent the American people,” Pelley concluded.

  • maniajack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    This article is fucked up. No one (likely) here saw the 60 minutes opening, we’re all reading about a huffpost article about the response from a bunch of people on Twitter, those might not even be Americans, they might have an IQ of 50, why are they driving the conversation? We’re not taking the time to watch the 60 minutes and we’re letting huffpost make money off of outrage culture. The content of the 60 minutes is the story and crucially important not the idiots/bots/propaganda responding to it. The shittiest type of journalism is based off Twitter replies and the best journalism is what 60 min is doing

  • NutWrench
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This is that “liberal news media” that MAGAs keep yammering on about. The one that’s owned by six corporations.

  • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    44
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The same people attacking Trump’s picks had no issue with Obama letting Citibank pick all of his people for him.

    Yes, Trump’s picks are bad, but Democrats aren’t really in a position to be pointing fingers. Blue & Red MAGA have no self-awareness.

    • JaggedRobotPubes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s like comparing a mean comment to a war crime. A very serious misunderstanding, or an attempt to mislead.

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Funny you bring up war crimes. Red & Blue MAGA don’t hold their own accountable for those either.

    • _lilith@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Other administrations being bad does not make this one better. Everyone is in a position to critique this administration because everyone has a stake.

    • octopus_ink
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Deep Cut whataboutism

      The same people attacking Trump’s picks had no issue with Obama letting Citibank pick all of his people for him.

      Really, you know that? Down to the last person? Pretty impressive.

      Also - can you remind me when Obama was last in office?

      Because it seems to me the time to complain about Obamas picks was when Obama was in office.

      How about folks who weren’t even voting age then? Do they also need to STFU about Trump confirming what everyone already knew by making garbage choices for his cabinet based primarily on their likelihood to support his fascist goals? How does the 8 year old Obama whataboutism come into play in that scenario?

      • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        3 hours ago

        “Whataboutism” is trying to excuse one person’s actions because of another person’s actions.

        I’m not excusing shit. They’re both crooks. I’m pointing out y’all don’t give a shit when a Dem does it.

        • octopus_ink
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I’m pointing out y’all don’t give a shit when a Dem does it.

          And I’m pointing out (among other things) that you don’t know that to be true.

          I’m not excusing shit.

          OK.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s convenient now. The news media isn’t so much biased in terms of left vs right, but rather they’re biased in favor of an explosive narrative. Trump provides so many explosive narratives just by his mere existence.

      So no, they’re not suddenly finding honesty. They’re starting to feast on the buffet they cooked for themselves.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Did any of these MAGAs tweet a list of qualifications other than loyalty to Trump? Because that’s how facts would work.

    Unless the facts don’t support another conclusion? How weird.

  • takeda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    224
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why are we accepting reporting on tweets as a journalism?

    Yeah MAGA reacted to the 60 minutes, but so what? One can find similar reactions on any topic, there’s nothing new that we learn by reading this. It just manufacturers outrage on the other side.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Whooo boy, let me introduce you to gaming and popular culture ‘journalism’, where these ‘journalists’ do almost nothing other than write op eds about the vibes they’re getting from Twitter in the past 48 hrs.

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I want to agree, but there is something to be said about the influence of social media on an average person. One reason I was really anxious about the election was whenever I saw shitload of likes on tweets that were straight up lies.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The problem with this garbage type of reporting is that you can create any narrative you want. Social media is so big that it’s not hard to find a handful of posts, like what is being posted in their story, saying almost anything you need them to. Always going to be some insane person in some corner of the internet saying something completely batshit.

        The article is really “we found some people on social media saying these things” and it’s being framed as “maga meltdown.” It’s fucking garbage.

        I agree that social media has a large influence, but how does garbage journalism like this do anything other than add more fuel to the fire of “traditional media is now trash”?

        • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Oooh, i misunderstood you at first. I 100% agree, I have unsubbed from some subreddits before because they kept posting tweets of “haters” as if that’s noteworthy in any way.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Right. Cherry-picking kool-aid enthusiasts spreading their knee-jerk reaction on social media isn’t journalism. These people are likely not valid representatives of public MAGA opinion, to say the least.

      The anti-mainstream media comment in particular turns this whole post so many levels of irony that it’s actually challenging to unpack it in a succinct way.

    • ThirdWorldOrder@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      They barely reacted. These maga types aren’t going to watch some video critical of their beliefs which are more akin to religious than political these days

    • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Then stop upvoting this stuff! During election time every damn article upvoted here was about i.) horse race reporting or ii.) Trump outrage. We have to stop clicking these links and sharing the articles.

  • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    ·
    1 day ago

    4 years of crybaby MAGA people who don’t know what’s what and thinks everything is against them. Which is partially true.

    4 years of this, people.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Thanks, Merrick Garland. Way to let a guy credibly accused of like 6 different Federal crimes (including a whole ass coup) just walk by slow walking investigations because you didn’t want to look political.

      • AfricanExpansionist
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Don’t worry, it’s all gonna be fine. Joe Biden shook hands with Trump at White House last week.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      4 more years of this. donvict’s bastardization of the slogan dates back to december 2011.

      the far right whining about the ‘liberal’ media goes back a lot earlier than that

    • crusa187
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 hours ago

      This part is actually kind of wild. For a people who idolize “strong men” to such a degree, the amount of crying they do is absurd.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Well, looks like it is already starting. I fully expected the donvict fans to get even angrier if he won. Just like last time.

    I think part of it is that they are now also having conversations in their lives where normal Americans are just fucking done with them. Just because they are enthusiastic about donvict, and gleefully voted for him over the objections of those around them, doesn’t mean they are going to just roll with it, and still be friends, lovers, relatives, because “it’s just politics”. Some people are just getting cut off:

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/man-left-speechless-as-wife-files-for-divorce-after-he-voted-for-donald-trump/ar-AA1tX4kp

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    So?

    I mean . . . this is nothing. This is just the kind of article you can expect for at least 3.7 years. You wanna dig your teeth into a second turd circus administration, feel free. It won’t change a motherfucking thing.

    The corporate medai has failed so spectacularly they’re just staring up their own asshole at this point asking each other what they think.

  • chakan2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Meh…no it didn’t. Maga people don’t watch 60 minutes. A bunch of X bots reposted a bunch of bot links.