• ltxrtquq
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Taking the data from here and throwing it in a spreadsheet, Trump got more votes than everyone else combined, including the Libertarian party, RFK Jr, and Write-ins.

      • SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 days ago

        Looking at that chart, she would have won in Wisconsin and gotten their ten electoral votes.

        What does it look like for the rest of the states?

        • ltxrtquq
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          18 days ago

          Across the country, it was Trump: 71,825,780 Everyone else: 69,303,000

          It says at the top of the page it was last updated a day ago, but I kind of doubt the numbers will change too dramatically.

          • ABCDE@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            18 days ago

            67m for Harris to 72m (rounded up) on the BBC; it was really not close eh.

          • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            18 days ago

            The other person was making the point that you can’t do it by total popular vote, you have to do it by state and then look at their electoral college votes.

            • ltxrtquq
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              18 days ago

              But the electoral college is dumb and pointless. This is the first time a Republican won the popular vote since 2004, or since 1988 if you don’t want to count an incumbent victory. That alone should tell you plenty about the state of the country right now.

              • AFK BRB Chocolate@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                17 days ago

                It’s dumb and pointless, but it’s literally the way a president is elected today. We have had many instances of people being elected president who didn’t win the popular vote. So if you want to try to figure out if third party candidates caused Trump to get elected, you have to look at it state by state.

              • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                18 days ago

                But the electoral college is dumb and pointless

                And its also how a president is elected in the United States, or 2016 would have gone a bit differently.

      • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        18 days ago

        But how do you count “didn’t vote”? And what about “voted on other parts but not for President because genocide or whatever”? That second group might be countable, but the first is like proving a negative

    • Darorad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      18 days ago

      Honestly, it doesn’t matter, even if every single 3rd party voter went for Harris, Trump still wins

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Some of them tried but state shenanigans prevented their ballot from counting.

        • normal_user@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          17 days ago

          Maybe the Democratic party should have been better st convincing these people that didn’t vote, instead of alienating them on both the economy and foreign policy.

          But sure, go out and scream at people for not supporting Genocide and for feeling worse off financially after Biden. I’m sure that will convince a lot of people to vote for your party at the next election.

          The US is really the only country where, the more people despise the party that they vote for, theore they are told they are protecting “democracy” and “freedom”. Freedom and democracy for who ? Clearly not for the average person that felt completely left out by the only 2 electable parties.

          • WrenFeathers@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            Hope those people enjoy what trump has to offer them for the next four years, and possibly longer.

            Also- no one supported genocide. You can stop now.

            You won.

            • normal_user@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              16 days ago

              If voting for a party (and maybe even telling others to vote for them) is not supporting their current action (especially when the candidate that is running is currently in power) than I don’t know what your definition of “support” is.