• Snowclone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s evidence he was trying to prevent worse things from happening. He hid the last dragons, he joined a extremist group, he was WAY ahead of Azula capturing him, his prison escape plan was likely a long term thought process he already had. Iroh was never going to be fire lord.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      23 hours ago

      He was first in line to be Fire Lord until his son died.

      I don’t think Iroh would have been as ruthless as his brother. But he did see conquest as a sort of duty.

      But then his son died, and he realized that it was all pointless.

  • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    152
    ·
    2 days ago

    No he “got away” with decades of war crimes by becoming disillusioned of the society he was born and bred in and becoming a political enemy of the state and putting his physical wellbeing at risk to free the people his country had waged war on all while mentoring the person who would take over that country and try to create a better country and a better world. One of the most poignant moments is when he says he didn’t realize his visions of conquering ba sing se would be him taking it back for its own people.

  • DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Varrick bombed buildings and tried to kidnap a president to start a war for profit and got away with it too.

    • rainbowtaint@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If Varrick were real, he would have blown himself up because he had a hissy fit, threw his briefcase at the wall, but forgot there was a bomb in there.

  • Dadifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure siege is considered a war crime. Isn’t that just standard medieval warfare?

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on the culture The Japanese viewed siege tactics as cowardly and armies at the gates would deliver food and supplies to the people in the walls. Ba Sing Se was able to convince it’s citizens there wasn’t even a war going on, I don’t think they were starving or being killed with siege weapons.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The other nations wouldn’t see it that way.

      There’s no central authority, but it’s not a machiavellian free-for-all like medeival Europe. The rest of the world was rather unhappy with the Fire Nation’s aggression, even in light if the world’s long history of warfare. He would be tried for that, no doubt.

      And his reputation/nickname is subtext for crimes he did commit but that the cartoon couldn’t spell out.

      • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean, that’s essentially saying it’s a war crime to be in the military during a war. Which is kind of silly to put it like that.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean really the existence of war crimes relies on the existence of treaties between the nations defining what those crimes are. Gonna guess the Fire Nation was not a signatory.

      • Muehe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        The Nazis weren’t signatories to the Nuremberg charter, yet they were judged by it. So there is precedent for judging war crimes without pre-existing law.

          • rainbowtaint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Maybe it’s like original sin, and any general in the same army that destroyed 25% of the world’s nations, is automatically a war criminal?

    • TOModera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, it’s not a war crime that I can find, however we can attribute harm caused to civilians through these actions, such as starvation due to supply lines cut off. So he did some vile shit, had a moment where he realized the error in his ways, then did everything in his power to make things better.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Except there no evidence of starvation in Ba Sing Se. After all, there was so little impact that the citizens could be convinced that there was no war.

        As to supply lines, earth benders cannot be locked in by a siege. They can create tunnel networks with a literal wave of the hand.

        So you’re inventing crimes that didn’t exist.

  • paultimate14@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    A war crime according to… Who? Is there some treaty or convention that happened? Is there some customary international law that he violated? I can’t find the Hague anywhere on any maps in this universe but maybe I missed something.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well he does leave the army and help the opposition so I’d say he redeemed himself hard

    • SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not only does he help the opposition, I’d argue he was one of the most involved people in bringing peace to the world, between everything he did to train Zuko to become a great leader and all the ways he helped team Avatar, I think the world would have turned out far darker if Iroh hadn’t existed.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    I like how NATLA goes into his “war crimes” more.

    And Lu Ten’s funeral… I cried over that scene.

    There’s a lot to not like about live-action atla, but I was there for all the Iroh/Zuko scenes. Kinda like Book 1 of ATLA, to be honest.

    • SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I agree, I love the change they made to include the fact that Zuko’s soldiers where the same ones he spoke out against sacrificing.