• Dadifer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m not sure siege is considered a war crime. Isn’t that just standard medieval warfare?

    • Snowclone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on the culture The Japanese viewed siege tactics as cowardly and armies at the gates would deliver food and supplies to the people in the walls. Ba Sing Se was able to convince it’s citizens there wasn’t even a war going on, I don’t think they were starving or being killed with siege weapons.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      The other nations wouldn’t see it that way.

      There’s no central authority, but it’s not a machiavellian free-for-all like medeival Europe. The rest of the world was rather unhappy with the Fire Nation’s aggression, even in light if the world’s long history of warfare. He would be tried for that, no doubt.

      And his reputation/nickname is subtext for crimes he did commit but that the cartoon couldn’t spell out.

    • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean really the existence of war crimes relies on the existence of treaties between the nations defining what those crimes are. Gonna guess the Fire Nation was not a signatory.

      • Muehe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        The Nazis weren’t signatories to the Nuremberg charter, yet they were judged by it. So there is precedent for judging war crimes without pre-existing law.

          • rainbowtaint@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Maybe it’s like original sin, and any general in the same army that destroyed 25% of the world’s nations, is automatically a war criminal?

    • TOModera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      No, it’s not a war crime that I can find, however we can attribute harm caused to civilians through these actions, such as starvation due to supply lines cut off. So he did some vile shit, had a moment where he realized the error in his ways, then did everything in his power to make things better.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Except there no evidence of starvation in Ba Sing Se. After all, there was so little impact that the citizens could be convinced that there was no war.

        As to supply lines, earth benders cannot be locked in by a siege. They can create tunnel networks with a literal wave of the hand.

        So you’re inventing crimes that didn’t exist.