• Lussy [any, hy/hym]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    The more I think about the Jonkler 2 the more I realize just how good it was. People say it’s done as a reaction to the first film, that it tries to back away from the type of people who related it to it. If anything, I thought it doubled down on its messaging, only that it actually spelled it out in this movie.

    This movie is bleak, one of the most depressing films I’ve seen maybe ever, and it truly had a lasting, saddening effect on me. While the first was entertaining in its escapism, this one is relentless in pushing the idea of pure despair. Over and over again it tries to reminds you there is no virtue to mentall illness, there is no glamour, and there is zero hope for anything better for anyone afflicted with it in this country. It feels like whiplash to people, as if it’s completely disjointed from the first but damn, I think it makes duology a masterpiece.

    The saddest thing is that the first had to make like a billion dollars, under the guise of cape shit, for this one to be made.

  • JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It was actually not bad. It stumbled on the ending but did a lot of things well for the DC universe’s « La La Land. »

  • doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Didn’t even know this movie had been announced until I’d heard it was bombing. I never watched the first one so odds were pretty slim I’d have seen it anyway.

  • Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I just don’t understand. The first was a novelty that did surprisingly well, I had no expectation that this would be anywhere as successful. Who’s making these estimates?