• shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Probably get hate for this around here, but it would be pants-on-head removed for a political candidate to propose a major policy shift 3-weeks before a national election.

    • DessalinesA
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      The major-policy shift: Not supporting an apartheid state that’s killing thousands of innocent civilians.

      • Fidel_Cashflow
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        don’t you see?? we have to continue our policy of giving unlimited material support to The Baby Chipper 9000, the electorino is at stake!!

    • WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Lots of people said that about switching candidates just a few months before the election but they pulled that off fine. Abandoning a pro-genocide stance seems like a low bar in that regard.

    • MorallyCoffee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Not really. Only Americans are so dense as to require several months to absorb something like that.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It’d be genius, if anything. Soon enough that people will know it and vote for her (the majority of Democrats support conditioning Israeli aid), too late for AIPAC’d propaganda machine to push the election towards Trump.