Stephen Starr in Hamtramck, Michigan
Mon 14 Oct 2024 11.00 EDT

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      It doesn’t, really. You’ll see when it fizzles out.

      Additonally, we can see even in other countries with RCV that it doesn’t majorly improve things, RCV isn’t a panacea, the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie still dominates the electoral system.

      • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I never said it was a panacea, I said you’d be able to vote for better candidates without risk, currently it makes no sense to vote for candidates that have no chance of winning.

        if it fizzles out It’ll be because of republicans, that many bills in that short of a time is not insignificant

        i don’t understand why you’re arguing against ranked choice, it’s objectively and obviously better than fptp

        do you think voting jill stein has a higher chance of success even though it’s mathematically impossible?

        if everyone doing that instead pushed for ranked choice, maybe you’d get some actual long term results instead of just throwing your vote away

        • Cowbee [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          I’m not arguing against RCV, I’m arguing against the idea that

          1: it will ever pass, and

          2: the idea that if it passed, it would change anything.

          Revolution is necessary, something you’d think was obvious given your username.

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            1: it will ever pass, and

            https://thefga.org/research/ranked-choice-voting-partisan-plot-to-disrupt-elections/

            you’re wrong there, by your own reasoning, it would be hugely beneficial for the democrats to pass ranked choice.

            2: the idea that if it passed, it would change anything.

            Of course it would change things, you’re clearly all or nothing, but the fact of the matter is ranked choice voting is OBJECTIVELY a better system, and it would allow you to actually run candidates and potentially make meaningful change. You would never have to hopelessly strategically vote and end up accomplishing nothing, you could have a socialist candidate that you could freely vote for without helping fascists. This is massive even if you refuse to acknowledge it.

            Revolution is necessary, something you’d think was obvious given your username.

            I agree, revolution is necessary to fix everything, but I don’t think revolution is more realistic than passing ranked choice voting, because i’m not braindead. The fact is, passing ranked choice would still be of great benefit to the working class, just because it doesn’t become your ideal utopia overnight doesn’t mean ranked choice doesn’t matter at all and isn’t worth doing.

            By your own logic, if no policy has ever benefitted the american people without a revolution, why did the ACA pass?

            • Cowbee [he/him]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’ve seen your article, I doubt it will happen. The ACA was passed in the most incomplete and gutted form possible that dramatically benefitted the pharmaceutical industry.

              And no, I’m a Marxist, not a Utopian. I understand that building takes time, I just understand that we have little control of what gets passed without outside pressure.

        • boywar3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          It’s probably best not to bother - these people want things as shitty as possible as fast as possible to make the revolution happen sooner or some shit

          • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            No they don’t, they just feel hopeless because meaningful change should be easy because a lot of the solutions are really fucking obvious but the MAGA side of the american people are actually mentally handicapped, and the democrat side is made moderate by their existence so almost nothing ever gets accomplished and it makes it feel like nothing CAN be accomplished.

            • boywar3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              The problem, of course, is that they have opted for the self-destructive course and lash out uselessly at people who want change but have been forced to look at the reality of the situation and try to reduce damage as much as possible.

              What they are doing now, calling anyone who votes Democrat a genocide supporter, is a prime example of that useless lashing out, as it isn’t productive, particularly in a rather small online space.

              • Freefall@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 month ago

                That is the part that gets me. They are our side’s version of MAGA-stupid. Their end goals align with us and their heart is in the right place (for our views, as MAGA is for their side’s), but they run on pure emotion and ignorance of the systems the real world has to operate in. In their rush for change they are happy to destroy their country and demolish the party that would move to their ends. Like going to a team checkers tournament and putting down chess pieces because they are stronger and give you more options, solid enough logic…then being disqualified and flipping the table and shitting on the others on your team trying to play good checkers. You still lose, your team is now down by one, and no one is playing chess…oh, and the other team promised to burn down the hall if they win.

                Honestly, it has gotten to the point that I am certain most of them are just working for the other side. It is easier to believe and isn’t unrealistic by any stretch.

                • boywar3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Yeah…at best they’re just useful idiots for the powers that be to exploit/point out as “look they are all crazy.”

                  Having dealt with them, they seem utterly committed to both parties being bad because they both serve capitalist ends and the ruling class (which is true tbh), but then fail to grasp that while both sides aren’t great, one side is at least doing SOMETHING positive while the other is actively trying to destroy things.

                  Just from a climate standpoint, at least the Dems are passing some kind of legislation about green energy and agree it exists, whereas the Republicans deny it and want to cut all remaining protections. This leaves us with two options: either these people want things to get worse out of some desire for change acceleration (yikes), or they really are just that stupid and can’t see any difference.

                  But also, you are literally killing Palestinians by saying these things - join me in waggling my finger at the government to feel better about yourself!