And if something did maybe happen, it’s the CIA’s fault

  • lugal@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do you agree with this implication or did you just explain it to me? Because I would never equate the actions of the government of a nation state with the people who happen to live there

    • alcoholicorn
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      I would if the people overwhelmingly support that action, yes.

              • lugal@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 months ago

                Still doesn’t make protest an low threshold way of political participation

          • erin (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t know how much you can trust the narrative when the media is all state controlled and anti-party speech is at best minimized, at worst censored. Total state control of the narrative is not conducive to free and fair elections, not to mention a police state. Before you whatabout, I’m well aware that the US is a police state and is controlled by two parties of neo-libs. I’m no supporter of the US, but I’m also no supporter of any autocratic regime. Calling the PRC a fair democracy is at best willfully ignoring the extreme state control over information, at worst denying a tyrannic despot twisting socialism into an autocratic, capitalist dictatorship while silencing opposition.