And if something did maybe happen, it’s the CIA’s fault

      • bi_tux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        most communities on ml are fine tho, also I got banned on hexbear because I called the CPC (their official name) CCP

        • barsquid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The admins are tankies. It’s just better to avoid it. The smaller their communities the more of a joke it is getting banned for writing a fact.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t have a problem with any of the communities but I regularly catch the instance ban hammer for asinine reasons.

      • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        lemmy.world is basically that. You’ll get the most concentrated socdem/socialist engagements without traipsing into hunny-cum-shot territory.

          • PugJesus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, basically. ‘Neoliberal’ and ‘lib’ are just snarl words many tankies use to mean “Anyone less fascist than Mao”.

            In general, .world is much less radical than many places on Lemmy. But they’re far from neoliberals. The average poster is slightly left of a Berniecrat, probably; that is to say, either a very strong SocDem or a very weak DemSoc.

            • Wogi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Listen all I’m saying is that if we were so far left that Bernie was center right on policy the country would be a much better place for everyone.

              • PugJesus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Wouldn’t it be lovely? Unfortunately, we’ve got a lot of fighting on the ground to convince our fellow citizens to get their asses there instead of some weird 90s fantasy world.

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            The people who think .world is socialist also think socialism is when the government does things and that social democracy is a type of socialism and not a type of liberalism.

            This is especially evident the way they get whipped into a froth any time actually existing (and former) socialist countries get brought up.

            • PugJesus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              This is especially evident the way they get whipped into a froth any time actually existing (and former) socialist countries get brought up.

              It’s funny that all the “AES” countries that are brought up are just authoritarian states, and sometimes, for that matter, authoritarian capitalist states. It’s almost like the people championing these supposedly socialist countries are just fascists painted red.

              • alcoholicorn
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The CIA tried to kill Charles DeGaulle in 1961, but if the CIA isn’t trying to kill your leader, you’re not doing socialism.

      • lugal@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        From what I know, dbzer0 is libertarian left and therefore not tankie

      • OpenStars@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Genuinely there are a lot of people that would like that. Maybe start with a community first before an entire instance.

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            The flood has started below. And indeed it is a bunch of @lemmy.ml, surprising nobody.

          • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Then that would be .ml users. Semantics yes, but considering that .world never federated with Hexbear, I feel it relevant for accurately describing things.

            • OpenStars@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              5 hours ago

              hexbear.net is known for discussion of what goes on in the rest of the Fediverse (I went and found a recent example to show you: https://hexbear.net/post/3645205). Whereupin people with accounts that are able to often brigade places that if we take the narrowest view of who “hexbear” users are, they would not have access to. It just goes with the territory of (a) being passionate about a subject, along with (b) caring not in the slightest bit about the consent of the recipients.

              I myself have multiple alts, and went to some trouble to ensure that it is barely recognizable which I am using (identical name and icon). I started on Kbin, and before it went defunct it got slower and slower so I switched to StarTrek, but it got slow for a bit too so now I made my final home on Discuss.Online. And when possible I will love to try out Sublinks, and probably I’ll try Piefed too then.

              If someone switches from their hexbear.net account, where they heard about this post, to their Lemmy.ml one for the express purpose to downvoting and trolling this post with their “commentary”, I would call those hexbear users. If you read hexbear posts, it won’t be all that long before you find people not only admitting but being outright proud of doing precisely that. Here’s a very tame one to get you started: https://hexbear.net/post/272530, here’s another: https://hexbear.net/post/277508, and another: https://hexbear.net/post/280770, and there are links from there and available by searching.

              • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 hours ago

                They even explicitly stated in one of their old federation threads that their sole purpose in federating with other instances is to “dunk” on anyone they disagree with and send brigades. This has been a longstanding problem with them, nothing they do outside of their instance is in good faith.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  Multiple of those links say that yeah. And the one where the admins took the vote, then ignored it and did the opposite of what the community asked. They are so toxic that they’ve even run off their own developers (I’m not sure if that really meant admin, but seeing as how iirc hexbear predates Lemmy it does make sense as actual developer too).

                  Some hexbears have left hexbear bc they were kicked out - too toxic for them even - but also some were not toxic enough, as in even they could no longer stand it there.

                  The only thing we absolutely must be intolerant of is intolerance.

              • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                4 hours ago

                That’s a fair way to look at it, yeah. I blocked the instance a whole back after being the target of the dunking culture and classification of statements like “peoples historically oppressed by a country can be reasonably expected to turn to terrible geopolitical powers, if faced with existential threat from said historical oppressors without other recourse” labeled as “fascist apologia” (referring to the USSR’s invasion of Finland, a country that was occupied and used as a battleground and colony by Sweden or Russia for centuries, leaving them with few options but the nazis to try to maintain a semblance of independence that they had previously won from the Russian Empire). If one can’t examine the mistakes of the past, they aren’t serious about trying to avoid them in the future and I ain’t got time for that shit.

                • OpenStars@discuss.online
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  There are lots of REAL leftists here on Lemmy. I haven’t researched enough to even know if I am truly one, but anyway it’s obvious that they are children (of whatever physical age) merely playing at philosophical and political concepts.

                  They constantly claim to be the victim, citing how “unfairly” they are treated, always conveniently ignoring that it’s not their political beliefs that turn people away, but their abusive toxicity. Using tactics such as controlling the conversation, which apparently works on their instance, but can’t hold a candle when talking with a real adult.

                  However, since anyone who even so much as politely asks (if not sufficiently obsequiously enough) the wrong sort of questions there are promptly removed, the ones who remain are absolutely convinced in the rightness of their cause, seeing nothing first-hand to counter such a claim. Echo chambers can really be dangerous.

                  Hexbear users are just like Maga conservatives, only on the other side of the spectrum - or at least claiming to be.

                  Lemmy.ml users on the other hand, are a much more eclectic bunch. Some are great to talk to, though conversely whenever I receive the most batshit insane replies, even after blocking Lemmygrad.ml and hexbear.net sth like 99% of the time it is a user from lemmy.ml. I find it highly relevant that a LOT of hexbear users went over to Lemmy.ml when Lemmy.world defederated from the former. So after resisting for a long time and even arguing with others against doing it, I finally relented and just blocked Lemmy.ml too. I find my sanity greatly improved as a result:-).

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        It was a relief when I started tagging them since I realised it’s just a small handful of people that are usually all over the comments so it looks like there’s way more of them.

        • ArxCyberwolf@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You can always rely on alcoholicorn to show up and say something stupid, for example. Ever since I tagged them I’ve seen them everywhere, always heavily downvoted for coming up with inane nonsense.

  • Ferrous
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    7 hours ago

    You know those tanks were trying to leave the square, right?

  • alcoholicorn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    50
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The chinese narrative isn’t that nothing happened, it’s that there was a battle outside the square, including protesters lynching and burning cops and cops gunning down unarmed protesters on bikes from their trucks. This is corroborated by videos and pictures.

    The western narrative of tanks going into the square and gunning down tens of thousands of protesters (after getting delayed by tank man) is blatantly false, as you can see in the uncut tankman video pans over to show the square the tanks are leaving was empty except for some bikes.

    • rsuri@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 minutes ago

      Your comment after being imported into China:

      The chinese narrative isn’t that nothing happened , it’s that there was a battle outside the square, including protesters lynching and burning cops and cops gunning down unarmed protesters on bikes from their trucks. This is corroborated by videos and pictures.

      The western narrative of tanks going into the square and gunning down tens of thousands of protesters (after getting delayed by tank man) is blatantly false, as you can see in the uncut tankman video pans over to show the square the tanks are leaving was empty except for some bikes.

    • davelA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Removed by mod

    • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      “After several weeks of standoffs and violent confrontations between the army and demonstrators left many on both sides severely injured, a meeting held among the CCP’s top leadership on 1 June concluded with a decision to clear the square.[15][13][14] The troops advanced into central parts of Beijing on the city’s major thoroughfares in the early morning hours of 4 June and engaged in bloody clashes with demonstrators attempting to block them, in which many people – demonstrators, bystanders, and soldiers – were killed. Estimates of the death toll vary from several hundred to several thousand, with thousands more wounded.[16][17][18][19][20][21]”

      When you go to Wikipedia, click on those numbers in the brackets

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        8 hours ago

        As I said, there were clashes at major thoroughfares surrounding the square, there was not tanks gunning down masses of protesters inside the square.

        • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          35
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          Who said anything about tanks shooting people? Did you just make that up and denied it yourself? Lmao.

          Student protesters where shot up and killed. Indiscriminataley. I could not fucking care less what type of pew pew was used.

          • idunnololz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah but if you don’t know what exact bullet they used or what they had for breakfast that morning then your argument is invalid I’m afraid /s

          • alcoholicorn
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            22
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            It’s what I learned in highschool and I see it repeated every time this discussion comes up, that there were a bunch of peaceful protesters inside the square, and tanks came over, machine gunned them, then ran the bodies over.

            There’s a huge difference between protesters lynching some cops and other cops responding with indiscriminate murder and the military murdering everyone because they dared protest.

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Like clockwork you’re here to deny the many atrocities of authoritarian despots.

      What do you even get out of constantly getting your metaphoric-cock beaten into the dirt 2 dozen times a day?

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 hours ago

        What exactly do you think happened, and what do you think I am claiming happened?

    • basmati@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      You’re never going to convert sinophobes. It’s like trying to convert white supremacists, except even more unlikely to work since there is zero pressure to not be sinophobic in society.

        • basmati@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The people control that regime in a much more robust democracy than the US has.

            • alcoholicorn
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              37 minutes ago

              The implication of what they’re saying is that the Chinese government’s actions generally represent the will of the Chinese people so you can’t just separate them like you can with America.

    • umbrella
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      9 hours ago

      sshhh, these people just want to china bad in peace.

      • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Can you please be a moron in silence? Or go be a moron somewhere else.

        “These people”… Lmao

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Quick, hop onto a sockpuppet account to make yourself seem less brain damaged 🤡

            • umbrella
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              quick, say something of value at all! no? oh ok

          • Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Yes, I did. Tianmen square massacre deniers make me mad.

            It should make you mad as well, if you were a decent person.

            • workerONE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              6 hours ago

              Wikipedia indicates there wasn’t a massacre in Tiananmen square: “Several people who were situated around the square that night, including former Beijing bureau chief of The Washington Post Jay Mathews[f] and CBS correspondent Richard Roth[g] reported that while they had heard sporadic gunfire, they could not find enough evidence to suggest that a massacre took place on the square”

              “In 2011, three secret cables from the United States embassy in Beijing agreed there was no bloodshed inside Tiananmen Square.[244] Instead, they said Chinese soldiers opened fire on protesters outside the square as they fought their way from the west towards the center.[244] A Chilean diplomat who had been positioned next to a Red Cross station inside the square told his US counterparts that he did not observe any mass firing of weapons into the crowds in the square itself, although sporadic gunfire was heard. He said that most of the troops who entered the square were armed only with anti-riot gear.”

              While they do provide sources that say the student death toll was likely high, most sources estimate around 500. (Again, not in the square itself)

              I’m just trying to be factual- the students were funded and supported by Western forces including the United States, probably not to help the students and spread democracy and capitalism, but to create division. The students clashed with China’s fucked up communist government and military. There’s not too many possibilities when a civilian force clashes with a state military.

              I support you if you oppose China’s actions here, I just think saying there was a massacre in Tiananmen square is insincere.

      • alcoholicorn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        No nuance, only china bad evil commees who kill their own people because they hate freedom.