• basmati@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    As someone that’s worked in trust and safety for a decade. None of this is new nor unique to Roblox, and Robloxs moderation is better than most.

    Every single site, game, online space, program, app, etc that has interactive features has both pedophiles and children on it interacting without active monitoring.

    It’s a fact of the Internet. The best you can do is leverage warn and monitor key phrase lists to take action when conversation veers to the obvious inappropriate line. Nothing anyone can do will ever prevent or stop this interaction.

      • basmati@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Roblox has robust parental controls, including blocking all forms of chat entirely. If parents fail to use them, as is nearly always the case in modern cases where children are chatting with predators, that’s on the parents. There literally isn’t a solution that isn’t either require an id to access online services, which is a no go in any intelligent society, or disabled chat on any game that a child could reasonably access, which would kill online gaming entirely.

        • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          If they have parental controls, I definitely agree they’re doing a sizable chunk of their job right there. I just thought it was worth mentioning as it wasn’t part of your “doing everything you can do” bit.

  • CommanderCloon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Hidenburg research’s business model is to produce hit pieces to then short sell the company they attack. They have monetary incentives to attack companies, I don’t know if they’re trustworthy.

    • Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’d say it could go either way. You could publish a positive piece on a company and then buy stock in them. They can make a profit whether their research turns out positive or negative. This would however give them an incentive to sensationalize their results, to exaggerate their findings, be they positive or negative.

  • Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    good lord. that just started out bad and started spiraling into absolute chaos really REALLY fast.

    i didn’t know the extent. that is fucking hellish.