We are excited to announce that Arch Linux is entering into a direct collaboration with Valve. Valve is generously providing backing for two critical projects that will have a huge impact on our distribution: a build service infrastructure and a secure signing enclave. By supporting work on a freelance basis for these topics, Valve enables us to work on them without being limited solely by the free time of our volunteers.

This opportunity allows us to address some of the biggest outstanding challenges we have been facing for a while. The collaboration will speed-up the progress that would otherwise take much longer for us to achieve, and will ultimately unblock us from finally pursuing some of our planned endeavors. We are incredibly grateful for Valve to make this possible and for their explicit commitment to help and support Arch Linux.

These projects will follow our usual development and consensus-building workflows. [RFCs] will be created for any wide-ranging changes. Discussions on this mailing list as well as issue, milestone and epic planning in our GitLab will provide transparency and insight into the work. We believe this collaboration will greatly benefit Arch Linux, and are looking forward to share further development on this mailing list as work progresses.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Valve is a Titan doing incredible work for the open source community and making money while doing so.

    Successful open source software business model at work. Way to go.

    • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Successful open source software business model at work. Way to go.

      I don’t think FOSS represents a lot of how they make money, the money making is probably all closed source, so I don’t think it’s a good example. It’s more like a for-profit company also doing so good quality charity work on the side. It’s mostly good for their image and a way to tell Windows that they could go without them if they don’t collaborate.
      I fully enjoy what they have been doing as a Linux only patient gamer for the past years, but I am realistic.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        In reality, it’s likely a self-preservation move. Microsoft made what appeared to be a monopolistic move to control the entire Windows ecosystem when they added their own app store and the locked down S edition of Windows. If Valve both hadn’t invested in Linux and Microsoft hadn’t halted going down that path, they would have been screwed.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        and a way to tell Windows that they could go without them if they don’t collaborate.

        Ehhhh it’s a step in that direction. But as long as 96% or whatever of their users run Windows, it’s hardly much of a bargaining tool.

        I do think that’s what they’re working for. After all Windows could flip a switch at any time and royally fuck them.

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’d like to see a Sankey graph of where Valve’s money goes before I praise them that much for helping out a Linux distribution a bit.

      Lots of major companies like Microsoft and IBM also contribute to Linux, it doesn’t make them saints nor even necessarily compare to what they get for using the volunteer dev work inside Linux.

      Gabe Newell is a billionaire, Steam is a defacto monopoly that objectively charges more than they have to, and literally everyone who works at Valve is in the 1%. Let’s not fall over ourselves dick-riding them.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Being cautious of a corporation is never a bad thing, but remember: Valve isn’t a public company. They don’t have the same incentives and fiduciary duties that led to the enshittification of most other companies and services.

        Ultimately, yes, everything they do is entirely for their own benefit. But, they’re also free to focus on their long-term growth and returns. As long as the leadership doesn’t get changed to a bunch of shit-for-brains golden parachute MBAs, they’re going to want to keep their customers happy. It’s good for them, and it’s not terrible for us. Everybody wins.

        I would prefer they were a nonprofit, but I’m not going to complain when the mainstream alternatives to Steam are mostly comprised of shitty sales-focused storefronts created by companies beholden to their investors.

      • tyrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Oh come on. Mr negativity over here. FFS Valve has been a godsend compared to the likes of EA or Blizzard. I bet you complain when you get ice cream that it’s too cold

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’d like to see a Sankey graph of where Valve’s money goes before I praise them that much for helping out a Linux distribution a bit.

        I’d say it’s a lot more than “a bit”. It’s an enormous amount of help that pretty much everyone in the Linux (professional) community can, has, and will attest to.

        I don’t agree that they’re a monopoly, because they’ve done absolutely nothing to prevent competition. Other stores do it to themselves.

        I do agree though that their fees are exorbitant and their contributions to Linux are a teeny tiny fraction of their wealth, but I appreciate it regardless.