• Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    There was semblance of socialism yes. But it wasn’t a socialist government. Also is it really socialist if there are levels of people who get different levels of care, pay, and living conditions?

    • umbrella
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      you are thinking of communism, which hasnt been achieved anywhere yet

      • Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Because communism counts on the assumption that humans aren’t greedy fucks who are gonna abuse the system anyway they can. A place where everyone is equal? Even the ruling class? Literally impossible

        • umbrella
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          communism/anarchism pressuposes a system with no leaders or ruling class.

          humans look greedy as fuck because most of us live in late stage capitalism. humans are actually unique in our unprecedented ability for empathy and cooperation. (and its how we lived for most of our history)

    • Cowbee [he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      There was semblance of socialism yes. But it wasn’t a socialist government.

      What does this mean? Can you offer any explanation beyond “because I said so?”

      Also is it really socialist if there are levels of people who get different levels of care, pay, and living conditions?

      Yes, absolutely. What gave you the idea that Socialism is when everyone gets paid the same? Marx directly argued against that, along with Lenin.