• socsa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Are there any vegan communities on the internet which actually lift up veganism instead of seeking confrontation?

    • Well@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re cherry-picking friend. This server has lots of tasty recipes, food photos, gardening tips and interesting articles.

  • murtaza64@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not vegan or vegetarian but why the fuck is it that whenever I come across a post like this, all the comments are people from other instances whining? If you don’t like the movement then block and move on.

    • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Most people understand that killing for culinary pleasure is extremely fucked up. It’s a self evident conclusion.

      In our age using animal products is done because it is either pleasurable or convient. It takes active effort to deny the sheer horror of the reality of that. Anything that threatens to undermine the denial is thus hostile, and so needs to be attacked.

      you know this, it’s why you’re here attempting to salve your conscience with sympathy.

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        killing for culinary pleasure is extremely fucked up

        i’d argue that that’s simplistic

        people all have a line; vegans included… we kill yeast to make bread, and people are fine with that. there’s a line between yeast and humans, and we all draw it somewhere… which is to say nothing about the difference between vegetarian and vegan

        having a conversation about morals is fine; passing judgement on someone for their alternative views on where the line is is what most people don’t like

        • hamid 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Yeast is a single celled fungus and not an animal. The line is at animals.

          It is absolutely ok to pass judgement on people for doing something cruel, torturous, environmentally damaging and unnecessary.

          I pass judgement on Israel for carrying out a terrorist attack.

          Get the out of here with this no one can pass judgement and what about the plants nonsense.

    • november@lemmy.vg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      24 hours ago

      As opposed to the extremely non-emotional arguments such as “But I like how meat tastes” and “cheese tho” and “for every animal you don’t eat I’m gonna eat two”?

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      And what exactly is a logical reasoning?

      Pretty much all political reasoning is emotional, but for some reason, only the “other side” gets emotional.

      Wanting equality is an emotional reason. Wanting absolute freedom is emotional. Freedom of speech, aristocracy, fascism, anarchism, progressive income tax are all, if you keep asking “why?” emotional choices.

      If, at any point, someone says something is good or bad, well, that’s emotional, simply because these are purely human categories that are not rational.

      • hamid 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Vegans: Violently killing animals for no reason, ruining the environment, destroying cultures with animals is both logically and empathetically wrong

        Libs: BOTH SIDESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

      • oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can make a purely rational environmental argument with reducing CO2 emissions.

        A pure appeal to emotion is showing slaughterhouse footage or other animal suffering.

        A utilitarian philosophical argument about reducing suffering is also logical, not emotional.

        A emotional spiritual appeal can be made with karmic debt accumulated or similar.

        • hamid 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I don’t give a flying fuck about CO2. I care that you are murdering an animal and ending its life for no reason. Animals have rights including the right to live without your torturing them and mudering them. Everything else is out of scope for veganism. It is an ethical position advocating for the rights of animals, not a utilitarian calculation.

        • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          24 hours ago

          You can make a purely rational environmental argument with reducing CO2 emissions.

          Please do this without resorting to an emotional motivation such as “People enjoy being alive and not suffering” or whatever.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Of course that’s emotional.

          Reducing suffering is based on the idea that I don’t like suffering, therefore I don’t want others to suffer. That’s emotional.