• oberstoffensichtlich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can make a purely rational environmental argument with reducing CO2 emissions.

    A pure appeal to emotion is showing slaughterhouse footage or other animal suffering.

    A utilitarian philosophical argument about reducing suffering is also logical, not emotional.

    A emotional spiritual appeal can be made with karmic debt accumulated or similar.

    • hamid 🏴@vegantheoryclub.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I don’t give a flying fuck about CO2. I care that you are murdering an animal and ending its life for no reason. Animals have rights including the right to live without your torturing them and mudering them. Everything else is out of scope for veganism. It is an ethical position advocating for the rights of animals, not a utilitarian calculation.

    • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.orgM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can make a purely rational environmental argument with reducing CO2 emissions.

      Please do this without resorting to an emotional motivation such as “People enjoy being alive and not suffering” or whatever.

    • leisesprecher@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Of course that’s emotional.

      Reducing suffering is based on the idea that I don’t like suffering, therefore I don’t want others to suffer. That’s emotional.