• Malkhodr @lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 months ago

    Judges being responsible to the public, and gaining their mandate through popular election is anti-democracy. Lol’d at the comments of the US Ambassador.

    • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 months ago

      The reform faced a rare and stinging critique from US Ambassador Ken Salazar in Mexico City, in which he called the election of judges “a major risk to the functioning of Mexico’s democracy.”

      CNN is so reich-wing now that they think that’s a “stinging critique”

  • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    the thought process is: “electing judges is bad because there is a risk that incompetent people get elected”. As if we had competent judges right now lmao.

  • merthyr1831
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    not like there’s a precedent for unelected courts to have ideological tendencies that contravene popular opinion amirite

  • JaredLevi@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    US Ambassador Ken Salazar in Mexico City, in which he called the election of judges “a major risk to the functioning of Mexico’s democracy.” Cope more Ken!

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      its a major risk for sure, now the judges won’t rule out in favor, every single time, of international companies!