cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/19343412

The record shows that during his career as a member of the House of Representatives between 2007 and 2018, Walz consistently voted in favor of pro-Israeli positions. In these years he supported every Israeli war on Gaza, rejected the international consensus on the illegality of settlements in the West Bank, and opposed any unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state, preferring instead to pay lip service to a “negotiated peace” while Israel continued colonizing the West Bank unimpeded.

On January 9, 2009, Walz voted Yea on blatantly biased H. Res. 34, which essentially endorsed the pro-Israeli position on “Operation Cast Lead”

In June 2009, Walz visited Israel and the occupied West Bank on a Middle East tour, where he met with Benjamin Netanyahu (among other heads of state), and “told the Israelis he believes the growing number of Jewish settlements in the West Bank were hampering the prospects for peace”.

However, in March 2010, when tension between the Obama administration and the Netanyahu government was bubbling to the surface over the construction of settlements in East Jerusalem, Walz chose to attend and speak at the annual AIPAC conference, where he stated that “Israel is our truest and closest ally in the region, with a commitment to values of personal freedoms and liberties, surrounded by a pretty tough neighborhood.”

  • BumpingFuglies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    Of course. He’s a US politician. Can’t get into US politics without being a zionist. Sure, there are some who pay lip service to basic human decency by suggesting that maybe genocide isn’t okay, but I suspect they’re acting as controlled opposition, just to show the mostly-anti-genocide populace that not all politicians are zionists, that maybe it’s okay to do nothing since there are at least some people in power who acknowledge reality.