OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agoGrok do a goodlemmy.caimagemessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up11.49Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.47Karrow-down1imageGrok do a goodlemmy.caOttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·4 months agoHow is that any different from anyone else buying their mistress expensive gifts?
minus-squareZeppo@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 months agoShe wasn’t his mistress, for one.
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down8·4 months agoI think it’s just that having a mistress at all is generally frowned upon these days.
minus-squareIlovethebomb@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·4 months agoAs opposed to when it was socially acceptable?
minus-squareKanda@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoAh, yes! The time of Louis XIV. Only for the King, of course.
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoNo, not really. Just meant that, like, it’s not really that it’s different to someone else doing it; more like, that it’s bad whoever does it I guess
How is that any different from anyone else buying their mistress expensive gifts?
Because it was to shut her up.
She wasn’t his mistress, for one.
I think it’s just that having a mistress at all is generally frowned upon these days.
As opposed to when it was socially acceptable?
Ah, yes! The time of Louis XIV. Only for the King, of course.
No, not really. Just meant that, like, it’s not really that it’s different to someone else doing it; more like, that it’s bad whoever does it I guess