Those tranded Boeing Starliner astronauts are apparently being forced to deal with some pretty undignified living standards.

It sounds less than ideal — but as the report notes, Williams and Wilmore’s difficulties don’t end with their sleeping arrangements.

As with every ISS mission, the Starliner astronauts initially had specific jobs to do on board the station that would have eaten up their eight-day journey. As Time reports, their main priority was checking in on the Boeing capsule and making sure its communications, life support, and other essential functions were in good shape.

With that checklist done and their journey having been extended until possibly February due to Starliner’s technical issues, Wilmore and Williams have instead been assisting their fellow crew members with their tasks and experiments, including repairing a urine processing pump.

Beyond that lovely job, Wilmore and Williams were also forced to stretch their clothing rations because there’s no laundry on board the ISS. Generally speaking, astronauts pack enough clothes for the length of their journey, and with their trip home having been pushed back repeatedly, the Starliner crew had to make do until a Northrop Grumman resupply mission finally came to deliver them new clothes earlier this month.

  • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    41·
    4 months ago

    (Just gonna ignore the rest of the comment, huh?)

    Dude that’s pretty unremarkable for military personnel. NLTs aren’t exactly set in stone, and Captains Williams and Wilmore are 58 and 61 respectively. This is not the first time they have had to deal with something like this. They’re safe. They’re not leaving their young children without a parent. They’re not any more out of touch with their families than we all were during COVID. And, lets be honest, their families have had years to get comfortable with the fact that they are SPACE SHIP TEST PILOTS. Of all the things that could go wrong, this is pretty damn minor.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
      24·
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure how their being test pilots makes it any less horrible for them to be stuck somewhere for months when it was only supposed to be eight days.

      Do test pilots not find being separated from their children as sad a thing as everyone else who has children? I am guessing, in general, test pilots want to be with their children as much as most parents do.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        41·
        4 months ago

        I’m not sure how you think this is horrible?

        No seriously, I think there is a foundational difference between our perspectives here that is going to be really hard for you to overcome. For you, this situation would be awful. You’ve made that very clear. For me, and I am being 100% honest here, I would trade places with them in a heartbeat, and if I didn’t my family would never forgive me. My father might never speak to me again if he found out I’d turned down an opportunity like that, my partner might leave me. No, I really mean it.

        There are different people in the world. The kind of people that become test pilots have families that have to have accepted the incredible danger inherent to the job. Astronauts are in the same situation. Imagine what it must be like to love an astronaut test pilot. That would be incredibly stressful, and I would be nothing short of thrilled that this was not a worse disaster.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
          24·
          4 months ago

          Sorry… you think their kids would hate them if they turned down an eight-day trip to space that ended up lasting months?

          “I wish I spent months without my mom/dad” is generally not something kids who aren’t in abusive relationships think.

          Do you even have any kids?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            3·
            4 months ago

            Why are you being so combative about this? Not understanding how people could be at peace with this is disappointing, sure, but you’re endlessly trying to escalate this. Picking out one argument to attack from a stack of reasoned explanations, wholly ignoring the response to your last objection in favor of a new one that exaggerates the arguments made, approaching every new comment with a constant shifting of the goalposts.

            “I wish I spent months without my mom/dad” is blatantly re-framing my comment from the context it was presented and which it is relevant to. But to respond: Personally, speaking as a once and future child, I would not be wishing to have ‘spent months without’ with my parent. But if their fear of potentially being deprived of my presence stopped them from going to space, I would be absolutely furious with their selfishness, and if they went on this mission I would be proud beyond my ability to express, of them and their work. And I would be terrified for them. But fear is a natural response that fades with practice, and although I would miss them, knowing they were safe and doing what they chose to do would be reassurance enough to last me eight months, even if I couldn’t speak to them.