• Zaemz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Jesus. I always assumed there was creepy, evil “rich people doing weird shit” kinda stuff going on behind the scenes there, but this is worse than the masked-bloodpact-orgy-dressup deal I imagined.

    • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Makes sense.

      1. Create a massive rocket
      2. Burn a massive amount of rocket fuel to get it into space
      3. Surround the comet ice in enough artificially made heat resistant materials so it doesn’t burn up in the atmosphere
      4. Use more rocket fuel to angle the giant ball of ice so it doesn’t burn up on re-entry
      5. Burn some more fuel to slow down its descent once inside the atmosphere so it doesn’t crash into the earth, ending all life in the immediate area
      6. Drop the ball of unsalted ice in the ocean
    • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’ve seen a bunch of Terminator style movies where an AI slices, dices, scorches and/or nukes humanity to oblivion long before climate change gets us. I have it on good authority that we don’t need worry about the temperature change.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Making the sky grey would be very depressing way to address climate change, and likely still not enough.

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    When they first announced the launching of solar reflecting particles into the atmosphere to cool down the planet I thought it was pitched by a youtuber or someone

    I really didn’t expect to see it was Harvard

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      “We didn’t consider the idea because it sounded silly”

      Isn’t something I want scientists to say. So good on them for taking a look at the feasibility.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Honestly the best solution is the one that is probably the least feasible; an array of solar reflectors/collectors geosynchronously orbiting between the Earth and the Sun. Not only would it reduce the amount of sunlight getting to the planet, but you can manufacture them in space and use them to make electricity, hooray! But relax the space infrastructure to be able to pull it off right now. Maybe in a hundred years.